Start typing and hit "Enter" to search.
Research Shows the Public is More Liberal When it Comes to Immigration Than the Home Office

Research Shows The Public Is More Liberal When It Comes To Immigration Than The Home Office

In recent years, we have all seen stories, cases, and policies which remind us that the Government has been pursuing a hostile approach to immigration. Indeed, anyone who reads British newspapers on a regular basis would be forgiven for thinking that the British people are fundamentally against immigration, but is this so? Recent research on British social attitudes to post-Brexit immigration policy has provided some useful insight into how the British people truly view immigration, and this suggests that the Home Office is out of touch.

What Was the Research Trying to Establish?

The research by NatCen on British social attitudes towards ‘Post-Brexit public policy’, asked the question, “How should Britain use its newly acquired sovereignty?” It further explained the purpose of the study, “Once the UK has left the EU single market and customs union the UK government will acquire responsibility for a range of policy areas that have until now been subject to collective EU decisions. This chapter looks at attitudes towards some of the key decisions that the UK will now make in some of these areas…. It both assesses attitudes among the public as a whole and examines to what extent ‘Leavers’ hold different views from ‘Remainers’”.

Research of this nature can provide a useful understanding of how people in the UK view immigration, as opposed to the often-entrenched viewpoints expressed in the media. Even with this research, it is easy to see negative stances (for example this research shows more people want an end to free movement than those who do not) being taken by those in our society, but by digging a little deeper, it is possible to see that most people have more liberal views.

What Does the Research Tell Us About British Attitudes To Immigration Post-Brexit?

In some respects, the research certainly reinforces the view that immigration is a vexed issue in the UK, but there are some hints that British people hold some liberal views on the matter. For example, it is perhaps not surprising that comparing views on immigration from France, Poland, Pakistan, and Australia, more British people favour making it ‘relatively easy’ for Australians (35%) to come to Britain than nationals of Pakistan (15%). But, for all countries, most said that it should be neither easy nor difficult for immigrants to come to the UK, and there was little support for making it relatively difficult. This may go against the beliefs of many who would assume that British people would want to make it challenging for immigrants to come to the UK, this is not so; the majority favour a balanced approach.

Another interesting area is in relation to high vs low skilled immigration. According to the research, “there is plenty of polling that suggests voters are much warmer towards high-skill migration than they are to low-skilled (Blinder and Richards, 2020; Ford et al., 2012)”. They also point out though that “there is a risk that any description of potential migrants that refers to ‘high skill’ and ‘low skill’ is almost bound to evince a more favourable reaction to the former than to the latter. People will nearly always prefer more of a desirable quality such as skill over less”.

Their research, however, suggests that matters are not this simple. It is not just a case that British people think skilled = good, and low skilled = bad. To make this point, they asked respondents whether doctors, care workers, hotel cleaners, and bankers should be ranked low or high priority, or neither. Unsurprisingly, 80% said doctors should be a high priority. What was perhaps more of a surprise was that 60% felt care workers and 18% of bankers should have high priority. This suggests that people are not just looking at this from the single dimension of skill, but other preconceptions come into play. Whether many did not see care work as low paid, or they felt it was something that there were not enough domestic workers for, and hence immigrants should be allowed to come to fill such roles, is not clear.

As the study report explains, “It would seem that voters are inclined to consider the perceived ‘social worth’ of an occupation as well as the skills it requires when considering who should be admitted into the UK. The reputation of the banking profession took a severe knock in the wake of the 2008-9 financial crash, and perhaps we should not be surprised that this is one highly skilled occupation voters do not feel a need to enlarge with migrant labour (Park et al., 2013)”. In contrast, it appears that the British public does appreciate the contribution of immigrants in care roles.

What this suggests is that while the Government is drafting new post-Brexit policies and trying to get trade deals over the line in readiness for 2021, they don’t necessarily reflect the views of the public, which are more nuanced than saying no to free movement and no to immigration. As the study concludes, “Voters – on both sides of the Brexit divide – do not necessarily regard skill or income as important a determinant as to who should be allowed into the UK as current government proposals do”.

Final Words

While the research by NatCen continues to show the divide, which has ruptured the country when it comes to immigration and the EU, it also reveals that the British public may be somewhat more generous than the Home Office when it comes to how hard immigration should be. Furthermore, they don’t see everything from the perspective of skilled and low-skilled, rather the valued contribution of migrants. Let us hope these more liberal views continue to build in the next year, and the Home Office start to listen.

Get In Touch

Some of our Happy Client

Reiss Edwards Awards

ACQ5 Awards Award
Lexis Nexis
Three Best Rated
Department For International Development
University Of Cambridge
Lexology Legal Influencers
ACQ5 Awards Award ACQ5 Awards Award
Lexis Nexis Lexis Nexis
Three Best Rated Three Best Rated
Department For International Development Department For International Development
University Of Cambridge University Of Cambridge
Lexology Legal Influencers Lexology Legal Influencers


Andy Tieu is absolutely amazing.

As a lawyer myself I can categorically say that he knows his stuff, gentle, responsive, cares about you and not just about the money, very professional.
I mean I can go on and on!

Andy and the entire team at Reiss Edwards are amazing!

Thanks again Andy.

Kiran Sardar

I found Joe very helpful and tremendous patience which is a must in this professional as there are lots of emotions always involved in each and every case.

The way they dealt with my case during COVID19 Situation is highly appreciable. I would definitely recommend Joe D. and Anna F. Anna is an amazing lady, her patience is beyond my words.

Her hard work and professionalism have no boundaries. She is the right person for all type of cases.

Thanks to Anna and Joe for all your support and guidance which helped me fulfill my dream.

I would say Reiss Edwards is lucky to have Joe D. and Anna F. Great job Reiss Edwards.

thanks once again. Anna you’re a Gem and a Star.

Cheyam Shaked

"Anna Foley was the lawyer helping my partner obtain an EEA EFM visa. She was outstanding. Handling the case with constant correspondence over a lengthy, lockdown delayed 7-month application process. Her expert advice guided us successfully through some difficult times as a result of COVID-19. Some of the best service I have received for any service ever! Often replying to emails late at night, offering to send additional correspondence to the home office and going above and beyond in handling our case! Well done and thank you Reiss Edwards and thank you Anna!!".

Isaac .T

"Professional service. I was very impressed with the fact that my ILR application was successful 6 weeks after the submission amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. I also think the portfolio put together by the team at Reiss Edwards has played a big part in the quick turnaround of my application".

Reiss Edwards Reviews


"Andy Tieu is absolutely amazing, as a lawyer myself I can categorically say tha...

Read More

Kiran Sardar

"I found Joe very helpful and tremendous patience which is a must in this profes...

Read More

Cheyam Shaked

"Anna Foley was the lawyer helping my partner obtain an EEA EFM visa. She was ou...

Read More

Isaac .T

"Professional service. I was very impressed with the fact that my ILR applicatio...

Read More