COVID-19 SERVICE UPDATE: Our services remain fully operational with video conferencing and remote working allowing us to offer an uninterrupted and high-quality service.
✔ Call on 0203 744 2797, email firstname.lastname@example.org or use our website chat tool from Monday - Friday 9:00am to 5:30pm. Qualified and knowledgeable lawyers will answer your queries.
The question of whether or not to include international students into net migration figures have continued to gather momentum, especially during this election period. The public, including stakeholders (interested) in immigration are looking to see each party position on international students.
Issues here include the fate of post-study work, net migration figures amongst many others.
One aspect that all parties agree on is the fact that the UK must continue to welcome international students. However there are slight variations on how each party intends to open the country's borders to international students.
Are international students economic migrants or highly educated international talents? Are they just another foreigner coming into the country to stretch the NHS or they are migrants coming to add value to the country?
The Tory party have maintained their policy that international students must be part of net migration figures. What this means is that when the government say they are trying to cut net migration down to the tens of thousands, they are also referring to international students.
The tory manifesto reiterates the general consensus that the UK must remain welcoming to International students, but added that visa requirements for international students must be toughened to ensure that we maintain high standards.
Immigration solicitors have questioned what they actually mean by tougher visa requirements and how it will maintain high standards.
The decision to apply tougher visa requirement has however raised some more questions. Dominic Scott, Chief Executive of International Students for example said "I don't think anyone can say why that is either sensible or necessary.
Another prominent stakeholder Nicola Dandridge added that care should be taken to make sure that the "talk of toughening the visa requirements for students" doesn't deter those considering coming to study in the UK.
On the subject of tougher visa rule rules, there was a general consensus in the university community that this would send a negative message globally, especially against a backdrop of an already declining international student immigration.
Labour's approach and interpretation is a little more open and realistic. Highlighting the £25bn international students generate for the UK economy, Jeremy Corbyn's labour manifesto says it will develop and implement fair immigration rules," and emphasises that in trade negotiations, the party's priorities favour "growth, jobs and prosperity" over immigration targets.
This suggests that labour will not be putting a numerical tag or cap on the number of international students. However mentioning that it will be a fair immigration rule suggests that the border gates will not be 180 degrees open on both sides to international immigration. The border, according to labour will be open as the circumstance reasonably allows.
The labour manifesto also added that international students were not permanent residents and not going to be included in immigration numbers. They however vowed to crackdown on fake colleges.
The Liberal democrats were also of the opinion that international students should be removed from net migration figures.
They also hinted that they will be bringing back post study work visas.
The Liberal Democrats' manifesto says they will "ensure the UK is an attractive destination for overseas students".
The UK's tertiary education system is heavily reliant on the higher tuition fees paid by international students to fund its research.
The percentage of international students on a postgraduate course in the UK significantly surpasses that of home students who in most cases may be relying on funding from the government. International students in most cases always have to pay in full before they can be granted a visa to come to the UK to study.
International students are not allowed access to public funds. Thus there is no direct link that they drain public coffers. In most cases, they don't have UK references so they have to pay up to 6 months house rent in full.
With regards to draining the NHS as well, international students pay up to £200 per year as contributions to the NHS whether or not they use it; and irrespective of the frequency of use.
International students can only work for 20 hours a week. This means that they will still be strongly dependent on their families living abroad to support them financially. This means that monies from outside the country and internal economic activities will continue to pour into the UK's financial system - to finance international students living in the UK.
Reiss Edwards boasts of some of the best immigration lawyers in London. We have a team of expert and experience lawyers who have worked in some of the top immigration solicitor firms in the UK. Contact us today for a free initial consultation on 02037442797 or send us an email on email@example.com.
It's a shame that you dont have an 'Excellent' star rating on here, as my experience with Reiss Edwards is nothing short of an excellent rating. They handled my application for an Indefinite Leave to remain in April 2014 and did my husband's one very recently including my daughter. Every time i have approached them, they have continued to treat me with courtesy, respect and patience. Amar was indeed a very thorough and professional gentleman. He is very knowledgeable, corporative and engaging. He responded to my emails, calls and enquiries promptly. He was always reassuring. I could not have asked for a better Immigration service. I would recommend them over and over again for anyone looking for an immigration advice. They gave me a free immigration advice when i called them, and the quality of the advice was something other charge thousands for. If you need a particular, name, Amar would be it. He exemplifies, for me, the true, professional gentleman. He is a valuable asset to Reiss Edwards.
I am glad that i instructed Reiss Edwards on my visa matter. It started with a 20 minutes free immigration advice. I met with Amar to discuss my ILR refusal. He gave me a great deal of quality advice and decided to take on my messy case. I had doubts on the merits of my case by he was relatively convinced he could win it. That made me quite secure. To be honest, things did not start as quick as I would have wanted, but they kept on communicating the process and state of things to me.A big thank you to Verusha and Foram. They were also very helpful. Brilliant and informative. Their fee was fair and reasonable, especially if you compare them to other law firms and immigration law firms in London; some of whom even told me that i would not be able to get an indefinte leave to remain in this country. The process was long but was worth it. In the end, a big thank you to Reiss Edwards.
Investing over 2 million pounds is defintely not a routine decision. We had to make sure that the Tier 1 investor immigration lawyers that we'd be picking has to be one of the best within the Tier 1 investor category. We contacted Reiss Edwards and they were able to get us not only the Tier 1 investor visa but also suggested profitable investment portfolios in addition to what we already had in mind.
TI have just had British Citizenship application approved. Prior to making the application, i was not sure which law firm i should hire to facilitate the paperwork. After a few hours of research, i decided to go with Reiss Edwards and i must confess that i wasnt disappointed. The immigration lawyers at Reiss Edwards handled my case well and they really knew what they were doing. They were fully aware of what documents I needed and it was easy for them to tell if my case was going to be easy or not. At the end of the day, I have not received my British citizenship within 3 months. If anyone is looking for a good immigration lawyer to handle thier case, contact Reiss Edwards.
My wife's spouse visa extension application was refused by the Home Office and they gave her 14 days to leave the country. We contacted Reiss Edwards and they said "OK don't worry we will sort this out". They put together the list of documents for me to obtain and they prepared a bundle which was as thick as the printer it came out from.We followed everything they asked us to do and in the end we won our appeal and got our spouse visa. We can't recommend them enough and we have promised ourselves never to make any more UK visa applications without them.
The team of lawyers at Reiss Edwards are very professional and friendly people. Their experience in and around UK immigration law is quite extensive; be sure that you application is in safe and competent hands. My immigration matter was an indefinite leave to remain application based on Tier 1 on a self-employment basis. The immigration lawyers at Reiss Edwards made sure that the application was perfect and ready to be accepted. I got a positive decision and I recommend them highly for anyone who needs a UK immigration help.
I contacted Reiss Edwards to help me with my wife's UK settlement visa. They acted with utmost professionalism throughout the entire application. I spoke with Joe Dinh, he is an immigration solicitor and he is one of the best solicitors out there. He ensured that there was little to no room for error. At some point I thought he was over cautious. He remained calmed and continued to assure us on our immigration matter. Most people in his position would have panicked but he was calmed and continued to assure us. We received out positive outcome very quickly.
I have been using Reiss Edwards for three years now for my family's immigration application. Both for my initial application and extension. They are really affordable. The team of solicitors at this firm are probably one of the most efficient and economical in terms of cost. They offered free advice over the phone and spent good time with us before inviting us for consultation.
Reiss Edwards is a top notch immigration service company. The way they handled our documentation and also the list of documents they sent was efficient and top quality. They helped us professionally throughout the process. We are very happy with the immigration advice we received from the team. We highly recommend them.
I used Reiss Edwards immigration lawyers to assist with my immigration matter and that of my family. It was an EX1 application. They dealt with the matter properly and even when complications were coming up from the Home Office, they helped resolve the issue properly. They are very professional and are very popular in London. I am happy to have worked with them.
This is the only firm that i spoke with that didn't ask for money before listening to me, will be using them again.
I used Reiss Edwards for my Tier 2 visa application and it was successful. The team was ever present and happy to answer my question. The caseworker that dealing with my case went on holiday yet by case did not suffer one bit. Another lawyer stepped and took over the case without any hassle.
My Tier 1 Investor Visa was dealt with quickly and without issue. Would recommend Reiss Edwards as an Immigration law firm in London. Thank you to the team.
530 ReviewsREAD ALL REVIEWS