If your employer has recently been acquired or is merging with another company, you may have been told that your employment will be transferred under TUPE. In today's modern commercial world, mergers and acquisitions are a regular occurrence as businesses seek to gain a larger market share or provide new products or services. Most recently, the news has been filled with the acquisition of UK-based chip maker, Arm, to US firm NVIDIA.
ARM has over 6,000 employees in the UK, some of which will undoubtedly be lost, and some of which will transfer to NVIDIA. According to Venturebeat.com, NVIDIA will continue to employ staff in the UK; "Nvidia said it will expand Arm's presence in the UK by establishing a world-class AI research and education centre there and will build an Arm/Nvidia-powered AI supercomputer for research". It is possible that Arm's UK staff being retained by NVIDIA in the UK will be transferred under TUPE. In this article, we will explain what is meant by TUPE and whether an employer can change an employment contract.
TUPE refers to the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/246) and provides employment protection for those whose employer is undergoing a change of ownership. For employees of a business that has been acquired or is merging with another UK business, under TUPE, their roles should be transferred to the new employer under the same employment terms and with continuity of employment.
Regulation 4 of TUPE states, "a relevant transfer shall not operate so as to terminate the contract of employment of any person employed by the transferor and assigned to the organised grouping of resources or employees that is subject to the relevant transfer, which would otherwise be terminated by the transfer, but any such contract shall have effect after the transfer as if originally made between the person so employed and the transferee".
There are two main scenarios under which TUPE applies:
TUPE protection is provided if:
For TUPE to apply, the size of the business doesn't matter.
It is common for an employer taking on staff from a newly acquired business, or as a result of a merger to seek to standardise employment contracts, however, under the TUPE rules, this is not a valid reason for making such a change. The main principle of TUPE is that employees should enjoy the same terms of employment with their new employer. However, employers can make changes to an employment contract in limited circumstances. Under the TUPE regulations, changes to an employees' terms of employment cannot be made if the sole or principal reason for the change is the transfer itself. Changes can be made legally, however, if there is an economic, technical or organisational reason (ETO reason), or the terms of the contract expressly allow the new employer to make such a variation.
ETO (economic, technical or organisational) reasons are those that relate to staffing numbers and role functions required by the new employer. If an employer can make a strong case based on economic, technical, or organisation reasons to vary a contract, it may be legally able to do so. An economic reason for varying a contract may include making a large financial loss due to COVID-19. A technical reason may be valid if the new employer has been implementing new technology which has significantly reduced the number of staff in a particular type of role. And an organisational reason may relate to an ongoing process of restructuring within the organisation.
An ETO reason may also be acceptable where the employee is offered a different role type, or the new business is located in a different place. What matters is that for an ETO reason to be valid, it must have been happening anyway (i.e. not as a direct result of the merger or acquisition), and it must be conducted in a fair and balanced way across all staff members (i.e. not just those being taken on by the new employer).
If an employee is dismissed solely due to the transfer may be seen as unfair if this can be proven. In this case, it falls to the employee to prove this was the case. If the dismissal occurred on or around the time of the transfer, then this is relatively straightforward to prove to the employment tribunal.
If you have been informed that your role is at risk, or your contract will be varied as a result of a merger or acquisition involving your employer, it is recommended that you seek the advice of an employment Solicitor in the first instance. It is possible that your role is protected under TUPE even if your employer says this is not the case. What matters is determining whether they have the right to change your contract or dismiss you. If it is argued by your employer that the changes are being made for valid ETO reasons, but it can be shown demonstrably that it is more likely to be a direct result of the transfer, your rights may be protected.
It's a shame that you dont have an 'Excellent' star rating on here, as my experience with Reiss Edwards is nothing short of an excellent rating. They handled my application for an Indefinite Leave to remain in April 2014 and did my husband's one very recently including my daughter. Every time i have approached them, they have continued to treat me with courtesy, respect and patience. Amar was indeed a very thorough and professional gentleman. He is very knowledgeable, corporative and engaging. He responded to my emails, calls and enquiries promptly. He was always reassuring. I could not have asked for a better Immigration service. I would recommend them over and over again for anyone looking for an immigration advice. They gave me a free immigration advice when i called them, and the quality of the advice was something other charge thousands for. If you need a particular, name, Amar would be it. He exemplifies, for me, the true, professional gentleman. He is a valuable asset to Reiss Edwards.
I am glad that i instructed Reiss Edwards on my visa matter. It started with a 20 minutes free immigration advice. I met with Amar to discuss my ILR refusal. He gave me a great deal of quality advice and decided to take on my messy case. I had doubts on the merits of my case by he was relatively convinced he could win it. That made me quite secure. To be honest, things did not start as quick as I would have wanted, but they kept on communicating the process and state of things to me.A big thank you to Verusha and Foram. They were also very helpful. Brilliant and informative. Their fee was fair and reasonable, especially if you compare them to other law firms and immigration law firms in London; some of whom even told me that i would not be able to get an indefinte leave to remain in this country. The process was long but was worth it. In the end, a big thank you to Reiss Edwards.
Investing over 2 million pounds is defintely not a routine decision. We had to make sure that the Tier 1 investor immigration lawyers that we'd be picking has to be one of the best within the Tier 1 investor category. We contacted Reiss Edwards and they were able to get us not only the Tier 1 investor visa but also suggested profitable investment portfolios in addition to what we already had in mind.
TI have just had British Citizenship application approved. Prior to making the application, i was not sure which law firm i should hire to facilitate the paperwork. After a few hours of research, i decided to go with Reiss Edwards and i must confess that i wasnt disappointed. The immigration lawyers at Reiss Edwards handled my case well and they really knew what they were doing. They were fully aware of what documents I needed and it was easy for them to tell if my case was going to be easy or not. At the end of the day, I have not received my British citizenship within 3 months. If anyone is looking for a good immigration lawyer to handle thier case, contact Reiss Edwards.
My wife's spouse visa extension application was refused by the Home Office and they gave her 14 days to leave the country. We contacted Reiss Edwards and they said "OK don't worry we will sort this out". They put together the list of documents for me to obtain and they prepared a bundle which was as thick as the printer it came out from.We followed everything they asked us to do and in the end we won our appeal and got our spouse visa. We can't recommend them enough and we have promised ourselves never to make any more UK visa applications without them.
The team of lawyers at Reiss Edwards are very professional and friendly people. Their experience in and around UK immigration law is quite extensive; be sure that you application is in safe and competent hands. My immigration matter was an indefinite leave to remain application based on Tier 1 on a self-employment basis. The immigration lawyers at Reiss Edwards made sure that the application was perfect and ready to be accepted. I got a positive decision and I recommend them highly for anyone who needs a UK immigration help.
I contacted Reiss Edwards to help me with my wife's UK settlement visa. They acted with utmost professionalism throughout the entire application. I spoke with Joe Dinh, he is an immigration solicitor and he is one of the best solicitors out there. He ensured that there was little to no room for error. At some point I thought he was over cautious. He remained calmed and continued to assure us on our immigration matter. Most people in his position would have panicked but he was calmed and continued to assure us. We received out positive outcome very quickly.
I have been using Reiss Edwards for three years now for my family's immigration application. Both for my initial application and extension. They are really affordable. The team of solicitors at this firm are probably one of the most efficient and economical in terms of cost. They offered free advice over the phone and spent good time with us before inviting us for consultation.
Reiss Edwards is a top notch immigration service company. The way they handled our documentation and also the list of documents they sent was efficient and top quality. They helped us professionally throughout the process. We are very happy with the immigration advice we received from the team. We highly recommend them.
I used Reiss Edwards immigration lawyers to assist with my immigration matter and that of my family. It was an EX1 application. They dealt with the matter properly and even when complications were coming up from the Home Office, they helped resolve the issue properly. They are very professional and are very popular in London. I am happy to have worked with them.
This is the only firm that i spoke with that didn't ask for money before listening to me, will be using them again.
I used Reiss Edwards for my Tier 2 visa application and it was successful. The team was ever present and happy to answer my question. The caseworker that dealing with my case went on holiday yet by case did not suffer one bit. Another lawyer stepped and took over the case without any hassle.
My Tier 1 Investor Visa was dealt with quickly and without issue. Would recommend Reiss Edwards as an Immigration law firm in London. Thank you to the team.
530 ReviewsREAD ALL REVIEWS