It has been reported in The Times that an official report into the Windrush scandal, entitled Windrush Lessons Learned Review which stated that the Home Office was "institutionally racist" over its policy towards migrants, has been toned down.
"The Times reports that the phrase "institutionally racist", which was included in an early draft of the report, does not appear in more recent versions. Previous leaked extracts found that the Home Office was "reckless" and had developed a "defensive culture" over immigration policy."
The Windrush scandal was one of the most shameful incidents in modern British history and exposed many inconvenient truths about the Home Office's culture. However, the recent Court of Appeal order relating to the deportation of 50 people with criminal convictions to Jamaica illustrated that attitudes in Whitehall have not changed much when it comes to immigration.
Following the Second World War, Britain was in a sorry state (despite being victorious) and desperately needed labour to begin the massive task of rebuilding the country. Calls went out across the Commonwealth for people to come to the UK to live and work. The ship MV Empire Windrush, which arrived at Tilbury Docks, Essex, on 22 June 1948, brought workers from Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago and other islands. This is how the Windrush generation, those arriving in the UK between 1948 and 1971 from Caribbean countries, came to be named.
After this, a British passport-holder born overseas could only settle in the UK if they firstly had a work permit and, secondly, could prove that a parent or grandparent had been born in the UK.
The Home Office failed to keep records or provide paperwork to people of the Windrush generation to prove they had obtained Settlement. In the last few years, as people have been required to provide proof of Settlement before working, renting a home, or getting NHS treatment, many members of the Windrush generation have been deported or threatened with deportation, despite having lived in the UK since childhood.
Following a national outcry, the Home Office issued an apology to those affected by the scandal and provided them with Indefinite Leave to Remain status. However, this has not helped those that have already been deported to Jamaica, some of whom have since died.
In February 2020, fresh controversy erupted over the deportation of criminals convicted of serious offences.
Under the UK Borders Act 2007, section 32 (5), "automatic" deportation applies to any foreign national convicted of a crime and sentenced to more than 12 months. The only exception to this is if the removal would breach human rights.
However, former Home Secretary and Prime Minister, Theresa May, tightened up the law so if a person is convicted of a very serious offence such as rape or murder, they will be deported back to their country of birth unless very compelling circumstances apply.
On 11 February 2020, a chartered flight bound for Jamaica was scheduled to depart with several convicted criminals on board who have served sentences for serious crimes. One of the people on board had lived in the UK since he was five years old.
In a late-night appeal, the Court of Appeal stated that certain deportees could not be sent to Jamaica as they may have been prevented from getting legal advice due to a faulty O2 cell phone mast.
"The defendant's [Home Office] own policy provides that "detainees being removed by charter flight subject to special arrangements must be given a minimum of five working days' notice of removal so that he or she may seek legal advice".
Evidence suggested that due to the problems with the O2 mast, at best, some detainees had access to a mobile phone for three days, at worst, some still had no way of speaking with their lawyer right up until the case was heard.
The flight did leave the UK, but with far fewer deportees on board.
In a statement following the decision, the Home Office said: "The planned charter flight to Jamaica is specifically for deporting foreign national offenders.
"Those detained for removal include people convicted of manslaughter, rape, violent crime and dealing Class-A drugs.
"We are urgently asking the judge to reconsider their ruling and it would be inappropriate to comment further whilst legal proceedings are ongoing."
A leaked draft of the Windrush Lessons Learned Review revealed that the government had recommended that people who have lived in the UK since childhood should not be deported under the UK Borders Act 2007.
Controversy over deporting foreign criminals is not confined to the UK. At the beginning of March, New Zealand Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern told Australian Prime Minister, Scott Morrison that the Australian policy of deporting NZ born criminals to NZ was "corrosive" to the relationship between the two nations.
Ms Ardern said while many of those deported might have been born in New Zealand, they had spent their lives in Australia and were, for all intents and purposes, Australian.
She told Mr Morrison: "Do not deport your people and your problems."
On 21 February 2020, The Jamaican High Commissioner called for a suspension of deportations to Jamaica until the Home Office published its investigation into the Windrush scandal.
The High Commissioner said he was concerned about the "dignity and the human rights of the individuals earmarked for deportation".
"If these are people who have lived here since they were children, they have no connection, no relatives, no one to take care of them in Jamaica, then this for me is a human rights matter. "It is not just the people who are being deported, it is their children, it is their families. Are we acting intelligently, are we creating another set of problems when we do that?"
Every country should be able to deport violent criminals. However, by sending them 'home' to a country where they have no social or economic connections, nations are deporting their problems, expecting another country to deal with it. Furthermore, as we have seen, ripping people from their families and communities has a devastating effect, not only on the deportee but the children/partners/parents/siblings they leave behind.
Now that Britain has left the EU/EEA, any flaws in the Settled Status scheme will become apparent over the coming years. Judging from the Court of Appeal decision and the Home Office's refusal to back down on its insistence that foreign criminals can be deported, regardless of how long they have lived in the UK, it seems as though few lessons have been learned from the Windrush scandal.
We can only hope that EU/EEA citizens and their families will not suffer from the same harshness in the future.
It's a shame that you dont have an 'Excellent' star rating on here, as my experience with Reiss Edwards is nothing short of an excellent rating. They handled my application for an Indefinite Leave to remain in April 2014 and did my husband's one very recently including my daughter. Every time i have approached them, they have continued to treat me with courtesy, respect and patience. Amar was indeed a very thorough and professional gentleman. He is very knowledgeable, corporative and engaging. He responded to my emails, calls and enquiries promptly. He was always reassuring. I could not have asked for a better Immigration service. I would recommend them over and over again for anyone looking for an immigration advice. They gave me a free immigration advice when i called them, and the quality of the advice was something other charge thousands for. If you need a particular, name, Amar would be it. He exemplifies, for me, the true, professional gentleman. He is a valuable asset to Reiss Edwards.
I am glad that i instructed Reiss Edwards on my visa matter. It started with a 20 minutes free immigration advice. I met with Amar to discuss my ILR refusal. He gave me a great deal of quality advice and decided to take on my messy case. I had doubts on the merits of my case by he was relatively convinced he could win it. That made me quite secure. To be honest, things did not start as quick as I would have wanted, but they kept on communicating the process and state of things to me.A big thank you to Verusha and Foram. They were also very helpful. Brilliant and informative. Their fee was fair and reasonable, especially if you compare them to other law firms and immigration law firms in London; some of whom even told me that i would not be able to get an indefinte leave to remain in this country. The process was long but was worth it. In the end, a big thank you to Reiss Edwards.
Investing over 2 million pounds is defintely not a routine decision. We had to make sure that the Tier 1 investor immigration lawyers that we'd be picking has to be one of the best within the Tier 1 investor category. We contacted Reiss Edwards and they were able to get us not only the Tier 1 investor visa but also suggested profitable investment portfolios in addition to what we already had in mind.
TI have just had British Citizenship application approved. Prior to making the application, i was not sure which law firm i should hire to facilitate the paperwork. After a few hours of research, i decided to go with Reiss Edwards and i must confess that i wasnt disappointed. The immigration lawyers at Reiss Edwards handled my case well and they really knew what they were doing. They were fully aware of what documents I needed and it was easy for them to tell if my case was going to be easy or not. At the end of the day, I have not received my British citizenship within 3 months. If anyone is looking for a good immigration lawyer to handle thier case, contact Reiss Edwards.
My wife's spouse visa extension application was refused by the Home Office and they gave her 14 days to leave the country. We contacted Reiss Edwards and they said "OK don't worry we will sort this out". They put together the list of documents for me to obtain and they prepared a bundle which was as thick as the printer it came out from.We followed everything they asked us to do and in the end we won our appeal and got our spouse visa. We can't recommend them enough and we have promised ourselves never to make any more UK visa applications without them.
The team of lawyers at Reiss Edwards are very professional and friendly people. Their experience in and around UK immigration law is quite extensive; be sure that you application is in safe and competent hands. My immigration matter was an indefinite leave to remain application based on Tier 1 on a self-employment basis. The immigration lawyers at Reiss Edwards made sure that the application was perfect and ready to be accepted. I got a positive decision and I recommend them highly for anyone who needs a UK immigration help.
I contacted Reiss Edwards to help me with my wife's UK settlement visa. They acted with utmost professionalism throughout the entire application. I spoke with Joe Dinh, he is an immigration solicitor and he is one of the best solicitors out there. He ensured that there was little to no room for error. At some point I thought he was over cautious. He remained calmed and continued to assure us on our immigration matter. Most people in his position would have panicked but he was calmed and continued to assure us. We received out positive outcome very quickly.
I have been using Reiss Edwards for three years now for my family's immigration application. Both for my initial application and extension. They are really affordable. The team of solicitors at this firm are probably one of the most efficient and economical in terms of cost. They offered free advice over the phone and spent good time with us before inviting us for consultation.
Reiss Edwards is a top notch immigration service company. The way they handled our documentation and also the list of documents they sent was efficient and top quality. They helped us professionally throughout the process. We are very happy with the immigration advice we received from the team. We highly recommend them.
I used Reiss Edwards immigration lawyers to assist with my immigration matter and that of my family. It was an EX1 application. They dealt with the matter properly and even when complications were coming up from the Home Office, they helped resolve the issue properly. They are very professional and are very popular in London. I am happy to have worked with them.
This is the only firm that i spoke with that didn't ask for money before listening to me, will be using them again.
I used Reiss Edwards for my Tier 2 visa application and it was successful. The team was ever present and happy to answer my question. The caseworker that dealing with my case went on holiday yet by case did not suffer one bit. Another lawyer stepped and took over the case without any hassle.
My Tier 1 Investor Visa was dealt with quickly and without issue. Would recommend Reiss Edwards as an Immigration law firm in London. Thank you to the team.
530 ReviewsREAD ALL REVIEWS