COVID-19 SERVICE UPDATE: Our services remain fully operational with video conferencing and remote working allowing us to offer an uninterrupted and high-quality service.
✔ Call on 0203 744 2797, email firstname.lastname@example.org or use our website chat tool from Monday - Friday 9:00am to 5:30pm. Qualified and knowledgeable lawyers will answer your queries.
When it comes to obtaining a visa for the UK the rules are complex and they are constantly evolving. The onus tends to be put on the person making the application to comply with the latest rules even when these rules are not clear and obvious. The rules regarding a 'grace period' for people who overstay their visa were changed on 24th November 2016. The previous 28 day grace period was abolished and the new rule is that there are only 14 days grace period provided there is 'good reason' for the overstay.
The problem with the new rules is that what constitutes a 'good reason' is not adequately defined in law. The guidance that is issued by the home office says that it is down to the caseworker to assess the merits of each case to determine if the reason given for overstaying is a 'good reason'. This means that it is a subjective evaluation of the casework as to regards the reason. The caseworker is told to pay mind to whether the over-stayer had the capability of preventing the reason for the over-staying or whether it was entirely out of their control. They also have to look at the credibility of evidence that has been provided by the over-stayer. This doesn't give a very clear idea of what will constitute a 'good reason'
The home office guidance does give some example of things that might constitute a genuinely good reason. These are:
It seems clear from the examples given that it is only in the more extreme circumstances that the grace period for overstaying will be adhered to. Therefore an over-stayer needs to make sure that they have as much external evidence to support their reasons as possible.
One of the knock-on effects of the change is that over-stayers are now able to get a second attempt at applying for leave to remain if they are refused at the first instance. So for example, if they apply for leave to remain late because e.g. Their passport was stolen (supported by a crime number) and that leave is subsequently refused. The person may now have overstayed by 3 months and under the old rules would be out of time for a chance to reapply. Under the new rules, they can apply again within 14 days of the refusal being made. This is a change that is welcome and aids people who have had problems with their applications. It still doesn't clarify what will be classed as a good reason.
What is clear is that if your 'good reason' is that you forgot, were too busy with work or studies or there was some other reason that was 'entirely within your control' then this will not constitute a good reason. This means you have to be very careful. If the situation is for example that a family pet is seriously ill and your children are distressed and have had to be pulled from school and so you are busy taking the pet to the vets and dealing with the children and this causes you to forget about getting your forms in on time then this is not likely to be accepted as a sufficient good reason to allow the application out of time.
If your 'good reasons' are not accepted this can have a knock-on effect on the over-stayer. At the point of over-stay, all rights granted under the visa are suspended and this includes having the right to work and access to things like benefits. If you are found guilty of being an over-stayer this is a criminal offence and can cause you to be refused a visa in the future on the basis that you have overstayed before. This means that the consequences for a 'good reason' not being accepted can be dire for the person involved. Being an over-stayer also tips a person into the 'hostile environment' category of the home office. This means that something even as simple as driving a vehicle whilst overstaying will be classified as a criminal offence.
So, if the 'Good Reason' is refused then this would have to be challenged by a judicial review of the decision. This means that it is likely that such challenges are going to increase particularly in more marginal cases. Whilst the guidance is less than definitive and there is no clear test it seems that 'difficulties that could realistically have been surmounted' would be a barrier to granting the grace period.
It goes without saying that if an over-stayer is looking to make an application during the grace period based on good reasons then they should have sound legal advice about their prospects of winning such an application. Good reasons arguments need to be made as strong as possible with as much supporting evidence as possible to go with them. Documentation from hospitals, banks, educational institutions or the police will all go a long way to helping to support the application.
Case law is constantly developing and there will no doubt be several test cases that go to the heart of what makes a 'good reason'. So if you are looking to make a grace period application then you must get robust legal advice so that you can be realistic about your prospects of winning such an application. The more information about the situation and the circumstances the more your case will have a chance of being approved.
If there is any chance that the situation could have been avoided then it seems more likely that the application will be refused. If you have already overstayed your visa then you should call us urgently to see if we can do anything to help you - this may not always be possible but please get in touch at the earliest possibility as this will certainly enhance our ability to help you.
It's a shame that you dont have an 'Excellent' star rating on here, as my experience with Reiss Edwards is nothing short of an excellent rating. They handled my application for an Indefinite Leave to remain in April 2014 and did my husband's one very recently including my daughter. Every time i have approached them, they have continued to treat me with courtesy, respect and patience. Amar was indeed a very thorough and professional gentleman. He is very knowledgeable, corporative and engaging. He responded to my emails, calls and enquiries promptly. He was always reassuring. I could not have asked for a better Immigration service. I would recommend them over and over again for anyone looking for an immigration advice. They gave me a free immigration advice when i called them, and the quality of the advice was something other charge thousands for. If you need a particular, name, Amar would be it. He exemplifies, for me, the true, professional gentleman. He is a valuable asset to Reiss Edwards.
I am glad that i instructed Reiss Edwards on my visa matter. It started with a 20 minutes free immigration advice. I met with Amar to discuss my ILR refusal. He gave me a great deal of quality advice and decided to take on my messy case. I had doubts on the merits of my case by he was relatively convinced he could win it. That made me quite secure. To be honest, things did not start as quick as I would have wanted, but they kept on communicating the process and state of things to me.A big thank you to Verusha and Foram. They were also very helpful. Brilliant and informative. Their fee was fair and reasonable, especially if you compare them to other law firms and immigration law firms in London; some of whom even told me that i would not be able to get an indefinte leave to remain in this country. The process was long but was worth it. In the end, a big thank you to Reiss Edwards.
Investing over 2 million pounds is defintely not a routine decision. We had to make sure that the Tier 1 investor immigration lawyers that we'd be picking has to be one of the best within the Tier 1 investor category. We contacted Reiss Edwards and they were able to get us not only the Tier 1 investor visa but also suggested profitable investment portfolios in addition to what we already had in mind.
TI have just had British Citizenship application approved. Prior to making the application, i was not sure which law firm i should hire to facilitate the paperwork. After a few hours of research, i decided to go with Reiss Edwards and i must confess that i wasnt disappointed. The immigration lawyers at Reiss Edwards handled my case well and they really knew what they were doing. They were fully aware of what documents I needed and it was easy for them to tell if my case was going to be easy or not. At the end of the day, I have not received my British citizenship within 3 months. If anyone is looking for a good immigration lawyer to handle thier case, contact Reiss Edwards.
My wife's spouse visa extension application was refused by the Home Office and they gave her 14 days to leave the country. We contacted Reiss Edwards and they said "OK don't worry we will sort this out". They put together the list of documents for me to obtain and they prepared a bundle which was as thick as the printer it came out from.We followed everything they asked us to do and in the end we won our appeal and got our spouse visa. We can't recommend them enough and we have promised ourselves never to make any more UK visa applications without them.
The team of lawyers at Reiss Edwards are very professional and friendly people. Their experience in and around UK immigration law is quite extensive; be sure that you application is in safe and competent hands. My immigration matter was an indefinite leave to remain application based on Tier 1 on a self-employment basis. The immigration lawyers at Reiss Edwards made sure that the application was perfect and ready to be accepted. I got a positive decision and I recommend them highly for anyone who needs a UK immigration help.
I contacted Reiss Edwards to help me with my wife's UK settlement visa. They acted with utmost professionalism throughout the entire application. I spoke with Joe Dinh, he is an immigration solicitor and he is one of the best solicitors out there. He ensured that there was little to no room for error. At some point I thought he was over cautious. He remained calmed and continued to assure us on our immigration matter. Most people in his position would have panicked but he was calmed and continued to assure us. We received out positive outcome very quickly.
I have been using Reiss Edwards for three years now for my family's immigration application. Both for my initial application and extension. They are really affordable. The team of solicitors at this firm are probably one of the most efficient and economical in terms of cost. They offered free advice over the phone and spent good time with us before inviting us for consultation.
Reiss Edwards is a top notch immigration service company. The way they handled our documentation and also the list of documents they sent was efficient and top quality. They helped us professionally throughout the process. We are very happy with the immigration advice we received from the team. We highly recommend them.
I used Reiss Edwards immigration lawyers to assist with my immigration matter and that of my family. It was an EX1 application. They dealt with the matter properly and even when complications were coming up from the Home Office, they helped resolve the issue properly. They are very professional and are very popular in London. I am happy to have worked with them.
This is the only firm that i spoke with that didn't ask for money before listening to me, will be using them again.
I used Reiss Edwards for my Tier 2 visa application and it was successful. The team was ever present and happy to answer my question. The caseworker that dealing with my case went on holiday yet by case did not suffer one bit. Another lawyer stepped and took over the case without any hassle.
My Tier 1 Investor Visa was dealt with quickly and without issue. Would recommend Reiss Edwards as an Immigration law firm in London. Thank you to the team.
530 ReviewsREAD ALL REVIEWS