Start typing and hit "Enter" to search.
Exemption from financial requirements in spouse visa extension

Exemption From Financial Requirements In Spouse Visa Extension

Non-EEA citizens applying for a UK family spouse visa need to understand and meet a large number of eligibility requirements in order to secure a positive decision by the Home Office, one of which relates to minimum annual income. Under this requirement, the applicant and their partner must have a combined income of no less than £18,600, but for applicants and sponsors (i.e. the UK based partner) who don’t quite have enough, cash savings can be used to make up any difference. That said because cash savings must be over £16,000, making up the gap in income in this way is only going to be possible for a limited number of migrants. The reality, therefore, is that if a prospective spouse visa applicant cannot prove sufficient income, they will need to look at ways in which they can satisfy the income requirement rules, or possibly be exempted.

Appendix FM Exceptional Circumstances

For family visa applications (including spouse visas), the primary source of detailed guidance and rules is contained is ‘Appendix FM’. Appendix FM includes several references to ‘exceptional circumstances’ which may be taken into consideration when deciding whether to grant a family visa. It must be stressed that the bar for these exceptional circumstances is very high, and hence it is important to prepare a robust case backed up with sufficient evidence.

Section GEN.3.1 (1) of Appendix FM states the following:

“Where:

(a) the financial requirement in paragraph E-ECP.3.1., E-LTRP.3.1 (in the context of an application for limited leave to remain as a partner), E-ECC.2.1 or E-LTRC.2.1 applies, and is not met from the specified sources referred to in the relevant paragraph; and

(b) it is evident from the information provided by the applicant that there are exceptional circumstances which could render refusal of entry clearance or leave to remain a breach of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights because such refusal could result in unjustifiably harsh consequences for the applicant, their partner or a relevant child; then

the decision-maker must consider whether such financial requirement is met through taking into account the sources of income, financial support or funds set out in paragraph 21A(2) of Appendix FM-SE (subject to the considerations in sub-paragraphs (3) to (8) of that paragraph).

This confirms that entry clearance officers must take into account other sources of income if an applicant for a family visa does not meet the financial requirement and there are exceptional circumstances. Paragraph 21A (2) states that the following sources of income, financial support, or funds will be taken into account:

  • (a) a credible guarantee of sustainable financial support to the applicant or their partner from a third party;
  • (b) credible prospective earnings from the sustainable employment or self-employment of the applicant or their partner; or
  • (c) any other credible and reliable source of income or funds for the applicant or their partner, which is available to them at the date of application or which will become available to them during the period of limited leave applied for.

A spouse visa applicant who is able to secure another source of income because they do not meet the financial requirement, will still, however, need to prove that refusal would result in ‘unjustifiably harsh consequences.’

Proving unjustifiably harsh consequences of refusal

To prove that refusal of the spouse visa would lead to unjustifiably harsh consequences and hence would be a breach of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) (article 8 confers the right to a private life), a strong case will need to be presented.

Unjustifiably harsh consequences are defined by the Home Office as “ones which involve a harsh outcome(s) for the applicant or their family which is not justified by the public interest, including in maintaining effective immigration controls, preventing burdens on the taxpayer, promoting integration and protecting the public and the rights and freedoms of others.”

The Home Office’s family policy goes on to state that “This [meeting the above definition of unjustifiably harsh consequences] involves consideration of whether a refusal would be proportionate, taking into account all the facts of the case and, as a primary consideration, the best interests of any relevant child. The case-law makes clear that where the applicant does not meet the requirements of the rules and has established their family life in ‘precarious’ circumstances (for example, when they have limited leave to enter or remain in the UK), something ‘very compelling’ is required to outweigh the public interest in refusal. Likewise, where family life is formed or exists with a person outside the UK who has no right to enter the UK and does not meet the requirements of the rules for entry clearance, Article 8 does not require that they are granted entry, in the absence of such exceptional circumstances”.

When assessing whether there is an unjustifiably harsh consequence of refusal, the Home Office will take into account a range of factors including whether the couple can relocate to another country, the best interests of any children, and mental and physical illness. As previously stated, the bar which must be met to prove this is unquestionably high. Being separated from family members, or a reduction in the quality of life by having to relocate the family to another country is unlikely to satisfy the requirement.

The Home Office provides some examples of situations which may meet the threshold needed, including if the couple has a child with serious physical or cognitive impairments, or if the applicant’s partner has a “genuine and subsisting parental relationship with a child in the UK of a former relationship, is taking an active role in the child’s upbringing, and the particular circumstances of the case mean that (taking into account the child’s best interests as a primary consideration) it would be unjustifiably harsh to expect the child to relocate overseas with the applicant’s partner, or for the applicant’s partner to do so without the child”.

Final words

Before considering whether exceptional circumstances apply, it is advisable to seek legal advice from immigration Solicitors who can fully assess whether you do meet the financial requirement. In some cases, when a full assessment is carried out, other forms of income which had not been considered by the applicant can be used to add to the income of the couple, and hence pass the threshold. This is preferable, where possible, due to the very high benchmark which must be met when proving exceptional circumstances apply.

Related Articles:

How to obtain a spouse visa and spouse visa extension

Five things to remember when applying for a spouse visa

2020 Financial requirements for a spouse visa after two and a half years

Some of our Happy Client

Reiss Edwards Awards

ACQ5 Awards Award
Lexis Nexis
Three Best Rated
Department For International Development
University Of Cambridge
Lexology Legal Influencers
ACQ5 Awards Award ACQ5 Awards Award
Lexis Nexis Lexis Nexis
Three Best Rated Three Best Rated
Department For International Development Department For International Development
University Of Cambridge University Of Cambridge
Lexology Legal Influencers Lexology Legal Influencers

O.L

Andy Tieu is absolutely amazing.

As a lawyer myself I can categorically say that he knows his stuff, gentle, responsive, cares about you and not just about the money, very professional.
I mean I can go on and on!

Andy and the entire team at Reiss Edwards are amazing!

Thanks again Andy.

Kiran Sardar


I found Joe very helpful and tremendous patience which is a must in this professional as there are lots of emotions always involved in each and every case.

The way they dealt with my case during COVID19 Situation is highly appreciable. I would definitely recommend Joe D. and Anna F. Anna is an amazing lady, her patience is beyond my words.

Her hard work and professionalism have no boundaries. She is the right person for all type of cases.

Thanks to Anna and Joe for all your support and guidance which helped me fulfill my dream.

I would say Reiss Edwards is lucky to have Joe D. and Anna F. Great job Reiss Edwards.

thanks once again. Anna you’re a Gem and a Star.

Cheyam Shaked

"Anna Foley was the lawyer helping my partner obtain an EEA EFM visa. She was outstanding. Handling the case with constant correspondence over a lengthy, lockdown delayed 7-month application process. Her expert advice guided us successfully through some difficult times as a result of COVID-19. Some of the best service I have received for any service ever! Often replying to emails late at night, offering to send additional correspondence to the home office and going above and beyond in handling our case! Well done and thank you Reiss Edwards and thank you Anna!!".

Isaac .T

"Professional service. I was very impressed with the fact that my ILR application was successful 6 weeks after the submission amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. I also think the portfolio put together by the team at Reiss Edwards has played a big part in the quick turnaround of my application".

Reiss Edwards Reviews

O.L

"Andy Tieu is absolutely amazing, as a lawyer myself I can categorically say tha...

Read More

Kiran Sardar

"I found Joe very helpful and tremendous patience which is a must in this profes...

Read More

Cheyam Shaked

"Anna Foley was the lawyer helping my partner obtain an EEA EFM visa. She was ou...

Read More

Isaac .T

"Professional service. I was very impressed with the fact that my ILR applicatio...

Read More