COVID-19 SERVICE UPDATE: At Reiss Edwards we recognise the impact the coronavirus is having on everyone. In response, we have created a cross firm group that will be able to offer you quick, independent immigration advice at your fingertips. In fact, we have extended our office hours to make the process as simple as possible.
✔ Call us from Monday - Friday 9:00am to 5:30pm and on Saturdays from 10am to 4pm.
She may be the Duchess of Sussex, but Los Angeles born Meghan Markle is not yet a British Citizen. As a member of the Royal Family, it may be assumed by some that she would have an automatic right to this status (after all, she has been married to the Queen's grandson for 18 months), but this is not the case. In practice, Ms Markle will have to acquire citizenship in the same way as other immigrants to the UK, by meeting the qualifying criteria. And this was likely all on track, but given recent events, there may now be a fly in the ointment. In this article, we will explore the impact of the recent change of plans by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex to live between North America and the UK, from an immigration standpoint, and what, assuming she still intends to work towards citizenship, she will need to do to qualify.
Ms Markle's immigration status is not a matter of public record, but, according to freemovement.org, it is likely she originally secured a fiance visa, which would have included a requirement to get married within six months. Following the marriage to Prince Harry on 19th May 2018, it is believed Ms Markle would then have secured a limited leave to remain visa as a partner for up to 30 months. To qualify for Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR), Ms Markle would still then have required a further extension of 30 months, due to the five-year ILR qualification period for the spouse of a British Citizen. As such, Ms Markle is still quite some time away from securing ILR, let alone British Citizenship.
When it comes to extending her visa, Ms Markle will have to satisfy the eligibility for limited leave to remain as a partner, which includes the following relationship requirement:
"since entry clearance as a partner was granted under paragraph D-ECP1.1. or since the last grant of limited leave to remain as a partner, the applicant and their partner have lived together in the UK or there is good reason, consistent with a continuing intention to live together permanently in the UK, for any period in which they have not done so".
Given the stated aim of the Duke and Duchess to spend time in the UK and North America, they will need to ensure they do not fall foul of the above rule. Unfortunately, it is not clear how an extension application will be decided given the range of factors which will be considered at the time. Additional guidiance provided by the Home Office on this matter states that if there have been 'limited' periods whereby time has been spent outside of the UK, there must be "good reasons and the reasons must be consistent with the intention to live together permanently in the UK. Good reasons could include time spent overseas in connection with the applicant's or their partner's work, holidays, training or study. If the applicant, their partner or both have spent the majority of the period overseas, there may be a reason to doubt that the couple intends to live together permanently in the UK." If the argument is being made the couple are trying to carve out a financially independent future, as in the case of R (Chaudhry) v Home Secretary  EWHC 3887 (Admin), it may be necessary to prove that Ms Markle had looked for work in the UK before looking overseas.
If Ms Markle does apply for an extension of her leave to remain and is successful in doing so, she may still face a challenge when applying for citizenship as a spouse of a British Citizen. It is well established that to do so, the application cannot have spent more than 270 days outside of the UK in the prior three years, or 90 days in the prior year. Everything, therefore, depends on how much time Ms Markle now spends in the UK over the next few years. If her time is split equally, she will be outside of the country by twice the allowed amount.
If Ms Markle does exceed the absence threshold, then all is not necessarily lost. The Home Office may apply discretion depending on the number of days absent from the country. However, that discretion may only be used where it can be shown the person applying "established their home, employment, family and finances in the UK." If this can be satisfied, discretion may be applied favourably if "the excess absences were an unavoidable consequence of the nature of the applicant's career", among other criteria. In other words, while discretion may be applied in favour of an applicant in such a situation, it is impossible to predict the outcome.
If the Duchess does eventually apply for British Citizenship, and the current rules apply, there are many considerations which need to weighed up by the decision-maker. There is little doubt that the circumstances being assessed will be unique, and it is impossible to predict the future factors which may add to the decision being made. Much also rests on the true intentions of the royal couple, including where any children may go to school, where they set up their future business venture, and where they pay their taxes. Another factor will be whether the couple continues in their royal roles, as ultimately, if they are to be taken seriously in such a capacity, surely, they would need to ensure a strong presence in the UK. But, if it is decided that they will live the bulk of their lives away from the UK, then it is difficult to see a route to British Citizenship without considerable discretion being applied by Home Office officials. Only time will tell what happens in the end; we will keep you updated as future events unfold.
It's a shame that you dont have an 'Excellent' star rating on here, as my experience with Reiss Edwards is nothing short of an excellent rating. They handled my application for an Indefinite Leave to remain in April 2014 and did my husband's one very recently including my daughter. Every time i have approached them, they have continued to treat me with courtesy, respect and patience. Amar was indeed a very thorough and professional gentleman. He is very knowledgeable, corporative and engaging. He responded to my emails, calls and enquiries promptly. He was always reassuring. I could not have asked for a better Immigration service. I would recommend them over and over again for anyone looking for an immigration advice. They gave me a free immigration advice when i called them, and the quality of the advice was something other charge thousands for. If you need a particular, name, Amar would be it. He exemplifies, for me, the true, professional gentleman. He is a valuable asset to Reiss Edwards.
I am glad that i instructed Reiss Edwards on my visa matter. It started with a 20 minutes free immigration advice. I met with Amar to discuss my ILR refusal. He gave me a great deal of quality advice and decided to take on my messy case. I had doubts on the merits of my case by he was relatively convinced he could win it. That made me quite secure. To be honest, things did not start as quick as I would have wanted, but they kept on communicating the process and state of things to me.A big thank you to Verusha and Foram. They were also very helpful. Brilliant and informative. Their fee was fair and reasonable, especially if you compare them to other law firms and immigration law firms in London; some of whom even told me that i would not be able to get an indefinte leave to remain in this country. The process was long but was worth it. In the end, a big thank you to Reiss Edwards.
Investing over 2 million pounds is defintely not a routine decision. We had to make sure that the Tier 1 investor immigration lawyers that we'd be picking has to be one of the best within the Tier 1 investor category. We contacted Reiss Edwards and they were able to get us not only the Tier 1 investor visa but also suggested profitable investment portfolios in addition to what we already had in mind.
TI have just had British Citizenship application approved. Prior to making the application, i was not sure which law firm i should hire to facilitate the paperwork. After a few hours of research, i decided to go with Reiss Edwards and i must confess that i wasnt disappointed. The immigration lawyers at Reiss Edwards handled my case well and they really knew what they were doing. They were fully aware of what documents I needed and it was easy for them to tell if my case was going to be easy or not. At the end of the day, I have not received my British citizenship within 3 months. If anyone is looking for a good immigration lawyer to handle thier case, contact Reiss Edwards.
My wife's spouse visa extension application was refused by the Home Office and they gave her 14 days to leave the country. We contacted Reiss Edwards and they said "OK don't worry we will sort this out". They put together the list of documents for me to obtain and they prepared a bundle which was as thick as the printer it came out from.We followed everything they asked us to do and in the end we won our appeal and got our spouse visa. We can't recommend them enough and we have promised ourselves never to make any more UK visa applications without them.
The team of lawyers at Reiss Edwards are very professional and friendly people. Their experience in and around UK immigration law is quite extensive; be sure that you application is in safe and competent hands. My immigration matter was an indefinite leave to remain application based on Tier 1 on a self-employment basis. The immigration lawyers at Reiss Edwards made sure that the application was perfect and ready to be accepted. I got a positive decision and I recommend them highly for anyone who needs a UK immigration help.
I contacted Reiss Edwards to help me with my wife's UK settlement visa. They acted with utmost professionalism throughout the entire application. I spoke with Joe Dinh, he is an immigration solicitor and he is one of the best solicitors out there. He ensured that there was little to no room for error. At some point I thought he was over cautious. He remained calmed and continued to assure us on our immigration matter. Most people in his position would have panicked but he was calmed and continued to assure us. We received out positive outcome very quickly.
I have been using Reiss Edwards for three years now for my family's immigration application. Both for my initial application and extension. They are really affordable. The team of solicitors at this firm are probably one of the most efficient and economical in terms of cost. They offered free advice over the phone and spent good time with us before inviting us for consultation.
Reiss Edwards is a top notch immigration service company. The way they handled our documentation and also the list of documents they sent was efficient and top quality. They helped us professionally throughout the process. We are very happy with the immigration advice we received from the team. We highly recommend them.
I used Reiss Edwards immigration lawyers to assist with my immigration matter and that of my family. It was an EX1 application. They dealt with the matter properly and even when complications were coming up from the Home Office, they helped resolve the issue properly. They are very professional and are very popular in London. I am happy to have worked with them.
This is the only firm that i spoke with that didn't ask for money before listening to me, will be using them again.
I used Reiss Edwards for my Tier 2 visa application and it was successful. The team was ever present and happy to answer my question. The caseworker that dealing with my case went on holiday yet by case did not suffer one bit. Another lawyer stepped and took over the case without any hassle.
My Tier 1 Investor Visa was dealt with quickly and without issue. Would recommend Reiss Edwards as an Immigration law firm in London. Thank you to the team.
530 ReviewsREAD ALL REVIEWS