uk immigration lawyers
uk immigration lawyers

Can Article 50 be halted in its Tracks?

Today in the High Court it was stated that the first challenge aimed at preventing the Prime Minister from triggering Article 50 was heard. The case was brought by a British citizen, Deir Dos Santos, who has been the subject of internet harassment and abuse after the revealing of his involvement, as well as the law firms involved in the challenge.

Due to the sensitivity and importance of the hearing, the hearing will be heard by the President of the Queen's Bench division, Sir Brian Leveson and Mr Justice Cranston who during Tony Blair's Labour Government where formerly an MP and a Solicitor General.

Jason Coppel QC announced for the Government that Article 50 will not be invoked until next year at the earliest.

The grounds for the case will be examined by the article and it would determine whether or not it makes available a much needed certainty for EU nationals who are working, living or studying in the UK or may be nervous about their residency status.

The Grounds for the Case

It is being argued by Mr Santos that the invoking of Article 50 (which will launch the UK's formal withdrawal process from the EU) can only be authorised by the Parliament not the Prime Minister. There are also seven other private actions of a similar nature that has been brought.

The following are stated by Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty:

  • If it is in accordance with its own constitutional requirements, any Member State may decide to withdraw from the Union.
  • The European Council will need to be notified of the Member State's intention to withdraw from the Union. The Union is required to negotiate and conclude agreements with that State, setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal, taking account of the framework for its future relationship with the Union and these are in accordance with the guidelines made available by the European Council. The negotiation of this agreement shall be done in accordance with Article 281(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. After procuring the consent of the European Parliament, the agreement will be concluded by the Council, acting by a qualified majority on behalf of the Union.
  • To the State in question, the Treaties shall cease to apply from the date of entry that the withdrawal agreement was enforced or failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2, unless there is a unanimous decision to extend this period by the European Council, in agreement with the Member State involved.
  • The member of the European Council or the council representing the withdrawing Member State shall not partake in the European Council or Council's discussions or anything decisions concerning it and this is also for the purposes of paragraphs 2 and 3.

    In accordance with Article 238 (3) (b) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, a qualified majority shall be defined.
  • The request by a State to re-join the Union after withdrawing from it shall be subject to the procedure referred to in Article 49.

It has been argued by the legal team that by triggering Article 50, the European Communities Act of 1972 will automatically but not immediately override and its own legislation can only be change by the Parliament. However, it is expected to be argued by the Crown that the Prime Minister alone under Royal Prerogative can trigger Article 50.

Under Article 50 (1) a State is must withdraw from the EU according to "its own constitutional requirements", therefore it is significant that the above mentioned legal issue is ruled on because there is no going back once it is done.

What is 'Royal Prerogative'

A series of historic powers which are in reality passed on to the Ministers but are officially held by the Queen is known as the Royal Prerogative. Decisions are enabled to be taken by the Ministers without the backing of or consultation with the Parliament. Both domestic and foreign affairs matters are covered by the Ministers as well as the power to:

  • Issue and cancel passports
  • Declare war
  • In the event of a grave national emergency "enter upon, take and destroy private property"
  • Generate treaties
  • Acknowledge foreign states
  • Appoint and dismiss Minsters

Although, the Royal Prerogative includes the Royal ownership of all swans, no complete list of the Royal Prerogative exists.

Controversy over the cases

It has also been noted that a greater part of the MPs have not been in favour of leaving the EU. Consequently, it is likely that the move will never occur if it is announced that Article 50 cannot be triggered by the Prime Minister without the consent of the Parliament.

This has instigated an immense frustration to leave voters, who view the legal challenges as a deceitful way to obstruct the Brexit process. A lot of law firms and their staffs involved in these type of cases have experienced abuse, as well as an abuse known as the racist anti-Semitic abuse.

Lord Leveson expressed that interfering with the course if justice by making threats was, "an extremely serious matter". Also, those involved in the abuse could be charged with contempt of court and the names of the initiators are being collated.

Still no certainty

To the EU citizens living in the UK or businesses trying to steer through the new uncertain economic waters, there is nothing in today's initial court hearing that makes available any more certainty to these individuals or businesses. Today, the UK economy's growth forecast was slashed by 0.9% by the IMF. This year's UK gross domestic product (GDP) figure has been pencilled in at 1.7%, down 0.2% compared to the outlook in April. However, the central forecast views next year's GDP to grow by 1.3% down from a previous prediction of 2.2%.

The World Economic Outlook Update stated that "The Brexit vote implies a substantial increase in economic, political and institutional uncertainty, which is estimated to have negative macroeconomic consequences, particularly in advanced European economies."

As stated by the IMF chief economist. Maurice Obstfeld stated that "Brexit has thrown a spanner in the works."

Even though, Article 50 has not been triggered yet, interest rates are also expected to be cut next month.

Reiss Edwards are highly regarded professional immigration lawyers based in London, UK who are often called upon by the media to present comments on developments in immigration law. To acquire more information in relation to obtaining a British Citizenship or UK Permanent Residence Card, contact us on +44(0)20 3439 9270.

Immigration Enquiry

subscribe to email and newsletters
Reiss Edwards Reviews
5 out of 5 stars 394 Google+ Reviews
reivew immigration lawyer

Our Brochure

Reiss Edwards immigration lawyers brochure

Arabic Brochure
Reiss Edwards immigration lawyers brochure

Immigration related Testimonials

Investing over 2 million pounds is defintely not a routine decision. We had to make sure that the Tier 1 investor immigration lawyers london that we would be picking has to be one of the best within the Tier 1 investor category. We contacted Reiss Edwards and they were able to get us not only the Tier 1 investor visa but also suggested profitable investment portfolios in addition to what we already had in mind.
The Home Office refused my Tier 1 Entrepreneur extension application. This meant that my family and i would have to go back to Jordan and my business would close down. I needed a good immigration lawyer to put in a very strong appeal. I approached Reiss Edwards based on a friend's recommendation and they put together a very strong appeal. I read the grounds of appeal and I knew that this was a winner. A big thanks to Joe who worked tireless on my appeal.
I am glad that i instructed Reiss Edwards on my visa matter.

It started with a 20 minutes free immigration advice. I met with Amar to discuss my ILR refusal. He gave me a great deal of quality advice and decided to take on my messy case. I had doubts on the merits of my case by he was relatively convinced he could win it. That made me quite secure.

To be honest, things did not start as quick as I would have wanted, but they kept on communicating the process and state of things to me

A big thank you to Verusha and Foram. They were also very helpful. Brilliant and informative.

Their fee was fair and reasonable, especially if you compare them to other law firms and immigration law firms in London; some of whom even told me that i would not be able to get an indefinte leave to remain in this country.

The process was long but was worth it. In the end, a big thank you to Reiss Edwards.
I have just had British Citizenship application approved. Prior to making the application, i was not sure which law firm i should hire to facilitate the paperwork. After a few hours of research, i decided to go with Reiss Edwards and i must confess that i wasnt disappointed.

The immigration lawyers at Reiss Edwards handled my case well and they really knew what they were doing. They were fully aware of what documents I needed and it was easy for them to tell if my case was going to be easy or not.

At the end of the day, I have not received my British citizenship within 3 months.

If anyone is looking for a good immigration lawyer to handle thier case, contact Reiss Edwards.
Fantastic Solicitors!!!

My wife's spouse visa extension application was refused by the Home Office and they gave her 14 days to leave the country. We contacted Reiss Edwards and they said "OK don't worry we will sort this out". They put together the list of documents for me to obtain and they prepared a bundle which was as thick as the printer it came out from.

We followed everything they asked us to do and in the end we won our appeal and got our spouse visa.

We can't recommend them enough and we have promised ourselves never to make any more UK visa applications without them.
The team of lawyers at Reiss Edwards are very professional and friendly people. Their experience in and around UK immigration law is quite extensive; be sure that you application is in safe and competent hands. My immigration matter was an indefinite leave to remain application based on Tier 1 on a self-employment basis. The immigration lawyers at Reiss Edwards made sure that the application was perfect and ready to be accepted. I got a positive decision and I recommend them highly for anyone who needs a UK immigration help.
This is the only firm that i spoke with that didn't ask for money before listening to me, will be using them again.
I used Reiss Edwards for my Tier 2 visa application and it was successful. The team was ever present and happy to answer my question.

The caseworker that dealing with my case went on holiday yet by case did not suffer one bit. Another lawyer stepped and took over the case without any hassle.
My Tier 1 Investor Visa was dealt with quickly and without issue. Would recommend Reiss Edwards as an Immigration law firm in London. Thank you to the team.
I contacted Reiss Edwards to help me with my wife’s UK settlement visa. They acted with utmost professionalism throughout the entire application. I spoke with Joe Dinh, he is an immigration solicitor and he is one of the best solicitors out there. He ensured that there was little to no room for error. At some point I thought he was over cautious. He remained calmed and continued to assure us on our immigration matter. Most people in his position would have panicked but he was calmed and continued to assure us. We received out positive outcome very quickly.

Click to view all google reviews
I have been using Reiss Edwards for three years now for my family's immigration application. Both for my initial application and extension. They are really affordable. The team of solicitors at this firm are probably one of the most efficient and economical in terms of cost. They offered free advice over the phone and spent good time with us before inviting us for consultation.

Click to view all google reviews
Reiss Edwards is a top notch immigration service company. The way they handled our documentation and also the list of documents they sent was efficient and top quality. They helped us professionally throughout the process. We are very happy with the immigration advice we received from the team. We highly recommend them.

Click to view all google reviews
I used Reiss Edwards’ immigration lawyers to assist with my immigration matter and that of my family. It was an EX1 application. They dealt with the matter properly and even when complications were coming up from the Home Office, they helped resolve the issue properly. They are very professional and are very popular in London. I am happy to have worked with them.

Click to view all google reviews
It's a shame that you dont have an 'Excellent' star rating on here, as my experience with Reiss Edwards is nothing short of an excellent rating. They handled my application for an Indefinite Leave to remain in April 2014 and did my husband's one very recently including my daughter. Every time i have approached them, they have continued to treat me with courtesy, respect and patience. Amar was indeed a very thorough and professional gentleman. He is very knowledgeable, corporative and engaging. He responded to my emails, calls and enquiries promptly. He was always reassuring. I could not have asked for a better Immigration service.

I would recommend them over and over again for anyone looking for an immigration advice.

They gave me a free immigration advice when i called them, and the quality of the advice was something other charge thousands for. If you need a particular, name, Amar would be it. He exemplifies, for me, the true, professional gentleman. He is a valuable asset to Reiss Edwards.

Kind regards
Nancy Jacquard

Copyright © 2019 Immigration Lawyer London