In 2014, the UK Home Office put in place a requirement for 98 o;f €˜straightforward' asylum applications to be processed within six months, but only five years later in 2019, the target was scrapped. As was reported by the Guardian in 2018, some asylum seekers have had to wait 20 years for a decision on their application. And to compound matters, the number of asylum applications pending for six months or more has been steadily rising since 2015 from ~10 to ~40.
With such a backdrop of rising delays, in some cases over 20 years, it is entirely understandable that an asylum seeker in the UK might want to get married without waiting for a decision from the Home Office.
While there is no specific rule which prohibits an asylum seeker waiting for a decision from the Home Office from getting married, the process might not be entirely straightforward. This is because asylum seekers will be subject to the €˜referral and investigation scheme' introduced by part 4 of the Immigration Act 2014. Under this scheme, non-EEA nationals who stand to benefit in immigration terms by getting married or entering into a civil partnership will be investigated to ensure their plans are legitimate.
Under UK law, anyone planning to enter into a marriage or a civil partnership is required to €˜give notice' to a registry office at least 28 days before the ceremony. Once registered, all proposed marriages and civil partnerships in the UK are referred to the Home Office by the registering official if they involve a non-EEA national with limited or no immigration status in the UK. This does not mean that an asylum seeker waiting for a decision will be refused, but it does mean that the circumstances of the intended marriage or civil partnership will be carefully vetted.
Where a notice of intention to marry or enter into a civil partnership is referred from the registration officer to the Marriage Referral and Assessment Unit (MRAU), the primary focus will be on checking for evidence of a €˜sham marriage'. According to section 24 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 (amended by section 55 of the Immigration Act 2014), a €˜sham marriage' is one where:
Investigating officers will also ensure that there is no evidence of an intention to enter into a forced marriage or trafficking/slavery. If the intended marriage or civil partnership is to be investigated, the notice period is then extended from 28 to 70 days to allow time for the investigation to be carried out.
It is important to note that if you and your partner are investigated, this is a routine process as required under law. Your willingness to be fully cooperative and helpful to the investigator will be very important in ensuring a positive outcome. According to the Home Office guidance for marriage investigation, if the couple being investigated are fully compliant, permission to marry may be granted, even where there are doubts about the relationship, if they are not compliant, the couple will be refused permission to marry. This is important as if the marriage or civil partnership is assessed as being a sham, the Home Office may order one or both individuals to have their leave curtailed, removed, deported, or referred for criminal investigation for committing perjury or facilitation of illegal immigration.
There have been many examples of genuine couples who been unfairly treated during the course of an investigation. According to examples cited by the Guardian newspaper, couples have been subjected to €˜insulting', €˜gruelling' and in some cases degrading questioning and checks. In some cases, highly personal questions have been asked, and the Home Office have even carried our early morning visits to check up on the number of toothbrushes.
In one serious case of extreme behaviour by Home Office officials cited in the article, Qasim, 29, from Pakistan, and Debora, 33, from Portugal, who planned to get married was asleep at home when they were raided by four officials in January 2016. Debora explained, we were questioned separately about our relationship and then Qasim was arrested, taken away and locked up in detention for four months before the Home Office finally accepted that our relationship was genuine.
If you or your partner is an asylum seeker in the UK awaiting a decision, and you plan to enter into a genuine marriage or civil partnership, it is highly recommended that you speak to an immigration Solicitor before visiting your local registry office. An immigration Solicitor will assess the details of your case and ensure that there is nothing which may (even if innocent) give the Home Office a reason to conclude the ceremony will not be genuine. It is better to take a cautious approach rather than facing an adverse outcome due to no fault of your own.
In the event that you do wish to register your marriage, you should receive permission well within the 70 days of extended notice. If you do not, or you receive notification that the Home Office suspects the marriage is a sham, then it will become important to seek legal assistance.
Asylum seekers in the UK can get married or enter into a civil partnership, but it is important to do everything possible to not fall foul of the UK's Government's hostile environment policies and rules. If you are in a genuine and subsisting relationship and you cooperate fully with the Home Office if investigated, there is every reason to believe you will be able to get married. If any suspicions are aroused, however, matters may become more complicated. It is for this reason that seeking legal advice as early as possible may prove invaluable.
Related Article: Read more on €˜How to claim asylum in the UK'
It's a shame that you dont have an 'Excellent' star rating on here, as my experience with Reiss Edwards is nothing short of an excellent rating. They handled my application for an Indefinite Leave to remain in April 2014 and did my husband's one very recently including my daughter. Every time i have approached them, they have continued to treat me with courtesy, respect and patience. Amar was indeed a very thorough and professional gentleman. He is very knowledgeable, corporative and engaging. He responded to my emails, calls and enquiries promptly. He was always reassuring. I could not have asked for a better Immigration service. I would recommend them over and over again for anyone looking for an immigration advice. They gave me a free immigration advice when i called them, and the quality of the advice was something other charge thousands for. If you need a particular, name, Amar would be it. He exemplifies, for me, the true, professional gentleman. He is a valuable asset to Reiss Edwards.
I am glad that i instructed Reiss Edwards on my visa matter. It started with a 20 minutes free immigration advice. I met with Amar to discuss my ILR refusal. He gave me a great deal of quality advice and decided to take on my messy case. I had doubts on the merits of my case by he was relatively convinced he could win it. That made me quite secure. To be honest, things did not start as quick as I would have wanted, but they kept on communicating the process and state of things to me.A big thank you to Verusha and Foram. They were also very helpful. Brilliant and informative. Their fee was fair and reasonable, especially if you compare them to other law firms and immigration law firms in London; some of whom even told me that i would not be able to get an indefinte leave to remain in this country. The process was long but was worth it. In the end, a big thank you to Reiss Edwards.
Investing over 2 million pounds is defintely not a routine decision. We had to make sure that the Tier 1 investor immigration lawyers that we'd be picking has to be one of the best within the Tier 1 investor category. We contacted Reiss Edwards and they were able to get us not only the Tier 1 investor visa but also suggested profitable investment portfolios in addition to what we already had in mind.
TI have just had British Citizenship application approved. Prior to making the application, i was not sure which law firm i should hire to facilitate the paperwork. After a few hours of research, i decided to go with Reiss Edwards and i must confess that i wasnt disappointed. The immigration lawyers at Reiss Edwards handled my case well and they really knew what they were doing. They were fully aware of what documents I needed and it was easy for them to tell if my case was going to be easy or not. At the end of the day, I have not received my British citizenship within 3 months. If anyone is looking for a good immigration lawyer to handle thier case, contact Reiss Edwards.
My wife's spouse visa extension application was refused by the Home Office and they gave her 14 days to leave the country. We contacted Reiss Edwards and they said "OK don't worry we will sort this out". They put together the list of documents for me to obtain and they prepared a bundle which was as thick as the printer it came out from.We followed everything they asked us to do and in the end we won our appeal and got our spouse visa. We can't recommend them enough and we have promised ourselves never to make any more UK visa applications without them.
The team of lawyers at Reiss Edwards are very professional and friendly people. Their experience in and around UK immigration law is quite extensive; be sure that you application is in safe and competent hands. My immigration matter was an indefinite leave to remain application based on Tier 1 on a self-employment basis. The immigration lawyers at Reiss Edwards made sure that the application was perfect and ready to be accepted. I got a positive decision and I recommend them highly for anyone who needs a UK immigration help.
I contacted Reiss Edwards to help me with my wife's UK settlement visa. They acted with utmost professionalism throughout the entire application. I spoke with Joe Dinh, he is an immigration solicitor and he is one of the best solicitors out there. He ensured that there was little to no room for error. At some point I thought he was over cautious. He remained calmed and continued to assure us on our immigration matter. Most people in his position would have panicked but he was calmed and continued to assure us. We received out positive outcome very quickly.
I have been using Reiss Edwards for three years now for my family's immigration application. Both for my initial application and extension. They are really affordable. The team of solicitors at this firm are probably one of the most efficient and economical in terms of cost. They offered free advice over the phone and spent good time with us before inviting us for consultation.
Reiss Edwards is a top notch immigration service company. The way they handled our documentation and also the list of documents they sent was efficient and top quality. They helped us professionally throughout the process. We are very happy with the immigration advice we received from the team. We highly recommend them.
I used Reiss Edwards immigration lawyers to assist with my immigration matter and that of my family. It was an EX1 application. They dealt with the matter properly and even when complications were coming up from the Home Office, they helped resolve the issue properly. They are very professional and are very popular in London. I am happy to have worked with them.
This is the only firm that i spoke with that didn't ask for money before listening to me, will be using them again.
I used Reiss Edwards for my Tier 2 visa application and it was successful. The team was ever present and happy to answer my question. The caseworker that dealing with my case went on holiday yet by case did not suffer one bit. Another lawyer stepped and took over the case without any hassle.
My Tier 1 Investor Visa was dealt with quickly and without issue. Would recommend Reiss Edwards as an Immigration law firm in London. Thank you to the team.
530 ReviewsREAD ALL REVIEWS