For family members wishing to join a loved one already present in the UK, the thought of having to complete the family visa application process for yourself and your children can seem daunting. This is not least because the UK Home Office place strict eligibility criteria on the granting of family visas, including the minimum income requirements. For most applicants, the minimum income requirement is met and their visa is granted with relative ease, but it pays never to be complacent. By ensuring you understand how the rules will be interpreted and the necessary proof required when submitting your application, you will have the best chance of success.
The government guidance for family visas states that you can apply for a family visa to live with your spouse or partner, fiancé, fiancée or proposed civil partner, child, parent, or relative who'll provide long-term care for you. The family visa is only required if you are planning to stay for more than six months, otherwise, you only need apply for a standard visitor visa (or marriage visitor visa if you are planning to get married to your partner in the UK).
If you are applying to join your partner, you will need to provide evidence that between you, you have a combined income of £18,600 or more per year. This income may be from the applicant or the applicant's partner (sponsor) (which can include a contribution from the applicant).
If you have children, you will need an additional £3,800 for the first child, and £2,400 for each additional child after the first. If you have children who are automatically entitled to remain in the UK, i.e. if they are British Citizens, EEA nationals, or already permanently settled, you will not need evidence of additional income.
Where appropriate, different forms of income can be combined, including your income from salaried and non-salaried employment, pension income, and non-employment income.
See also an article on 'Combining employed and self-employed income for a spouse visa application'
Yes, cash savings over £16,000 count towards your annual income. The minimum income requirement (as outlined above) can be lowered or even eliminated if the applicant (or their partner) has savings.
The Home Office uses a formula to work out how much cash savings can contribute towards the income requirement, as follows:
This amount can then be counted towards your annual income. For example, if you have savings of £20,000, your minimum income requirement will reduce by £1,600. The higher the amount of cash savings, the less annual income you will require.
This depends on the type of income you will be declaring in your application. If you or your partner are employed, you will need to provide the following evidence:
If you are relying on cash savings as part of your income, you will need to provide full bank statements proving that the funds have been in your (or your partner's) bank account for six months or more prior to the application being submitted.
If you (or your partner) are self-employed, you will need to provide details of income for the last full financial year (or an average of the previous two financial years). Sole-traders, partnerships, and franchises, need to provide evidence of tax payable, annual self-assessment to HMRC, and SA300 or SA302's. Limited company Directors will be asked to provide a Company Tax Return CT600, evidence of company registration, and annual financial accounts, in addition to other evidence.
The landmark Supreme Court case of MMand others v Secretary of State fir the Home Department  UKSC 10 led to changes to the rules and policies used by the Home Office. In addition to ensuring proper account is taken when assessing the minimum income of the impact on any children, Home Office case officers must consider whether the minimum income requirements can be met by using other sources (as defined in paragraph 21A of Appendix FM-SE). Home Office guidance states explicitly, "the decision maker must consider whether refusal of the application could breach ECHR Article 8 because it could result in unjustifiably harsh consequences for the applicant, their partner or a relevant child". It also states, "the decision maker must take into account, as a primary consideration, the best interests of any relevant child".
Additional income sources may include:
"(a) a credible guarantee of sustainable financial support to the applicant or their partner from a third party;
(b) credible prospective earnings from the sustainable employment or self-employment of the applicant or their partner; or
(c) any other credible and reliable source of income or funds for the applicant or their partner, which is available to them at the date of application or which will become available to them during the period of limited leave applied for."
The changes also mean that if other sources of income are used, the applicant, their partner, and any children, will be granted leave on a 10-year route to settlement. Furthermore, recourse to public funds will be permitted in certain circumstances (i.e. if there are compelling reasons which may affect the welfare of a child of a parent in receipt of a very low income".
Beyond the headline minimum income requirement of £18,600, the rules which must be met in order to be successful in being granted a family visa can be complicated. Even if your case is relatively straightforward, before submitting your application form and any documentary evidence of your eligibility, take the time to ensure that you have 'dotted the I's and crossed the t's'. Even a minor oversight can lead to outright rejection, or at the very least, a delay in your application. If you are in any doubt or you have specific concerns regarding your application, engage the services of immigration law solicitors who will navigate any complications and provide the best chance of success. When it comes to being reunited with your loved ones, do not take any chances.
It's a shame that you dont have an 'Excellent' star rating on here, as my experience with Reiss Edwards is nothing short of an excellent rating. They handled my application for an Indefinite Leave to remain in April 2014 and did my husband's one very recently including my daughter. Every time i have approached them, they have continued to treat me with courtesy, respect and patience. Amar was indeed a very thorough and professional gentleman. He is very knowledgeable, corporative and engaging. He responded to my emails, calls and enquiries promptly. He was always reassuring. I could not have asked for a better Immigration service. I would recommend them over and over again for anyone looking for an immigration advice. They gave me a free immigration advice when i called them, and the quality of the advice was something other charge thousands for. If you need a particular, name, Amar would be it. He exemplifies, for me, the true, professional gentleman. He is a valuable asset to Reiss Edwards.
I am glad that i instructed Reiss Edwards on my visa matter. It started with a 20 minutes free immigration advice. I met with Amar to discuss my ILR refusal. He gave me a great deal of quality advice and decided to take on my messy case. I had doubts on the merits of my case by he was relatively convinced he could win it. That made me quite secure. To be honest, things did not start as quick as I would have wanted, but they kept on communicating the process and state of things to me.A big thank you to Verusha and Foram. They were also very helpful. Brilliant and informative. Their fee was fair and reasonable, especially if you compare them to other law firms and immigration law firms in London; some of whom even told me that i would not be able to get an indefinte leave to remain in this country. The process was long but was worth it. In the end, a big thank you to Reiss Edwards.
Investing over 2 million pounds is defintely not a routine decision. We had to make sure that the Tier 1 investor immigration lawyers that we'd be picking has to be one of the best within the Tier 1 investor category. We contacted Reiss Edwards and they were able to get us not only the Tier 1 investor visa but also suggested profitable investment portfolios in addition to what we already had in mind.
TI have just had British Citizenship application approved. Prior to making the application, i was not sure which law firm i should hire to facilitate the paperwork. After a few hours of research, i decided to go with Reiss Edwards and i must confess that i wasnt disappointed. The immigration lawyers at Reiss Edwards handled my case well and they really knew what they were doing. They were fully aware of what documents I needed and it was easy for them to tell if my case was going to be easy or not. At the end of the day, I have not received my British citizenship within 3 months. If anyone is looking for a good immigration lawyer to handle thier case, contact Reiss Edwards.
My wife's spouse visa extension application was refused by the Home Office and they gave her 14 days to leave the country. We contacted Reiss Edwards and they said "OK don't worry we will sort this out". They put together the list of documents for me to obtain and they prepared a bundle which was as thick as the printer it came out from.We followed everything they asked us to do and in the end we won our appeal and got our spouse visa. We can't recommend them enough and we have promised ourselves never to make any more UK visa applications without them.
The team of lawyers at Reiss Edwards are very professional and friendly people. Their experience in and around UK immigration law is quite extensive; be sure that you application is in safe and competent hands. My immigration matter was an indefinite leave to remain application based on Tier 1 on a self-employment basis. The immigration lawyers at Reiss Edwards made sure that the application was perfect and ready to be accepted. I got a positive decision and I recommend them highly for anyone who needs a UK immigration help.
I contacted Reiss Edwards to help me with my wife's UK settlement visa. They acted with utmost professionalism throughout the entire application. I spoke with Joe Dinh, he is an immigration solicitor and he is one of the best solicitors out there. He ensured that there was little to no room for error. At some point I thought he was over cautious. He remained calmed and continued to assure us on our immigration matter. Most people in his position would have panicked but he was calmed and continued to assure us. We received out positive outcome very quickly.
I have been using Reiss Edwards for three years now for my family's immigration application. Both for my initial application and extension. They are really affordable. The team of solicitors at this firm are probably one of the most efficient and economical in terms of cost. They offered free advice over the phone and spent good time with us before inviting us for consultation.
Reiss Edwards is a top notch immigration service company. The way they handled our documentation and also the list of documents they sent was efficient and top quality. They helped us professionally throughout the process. We are very happy with the immigration advice we received from the team. We highly recommend them.
I used Reiss Edwards immigration lawyers to assist with my immigration matter and that of my family. It was an EX1 application. They dealt with the matter properly and even when complications were coming up from the Home Office, they helped resolve the issue properly. They are very professional and are very popular in London. I am happy to have worked with them.
This is the only firm that i spoke with that didn't ask for money before listening to me, will be using them again.
I used Reiss Edwards for my Tier 2 visa application and it was successful. The team was ever present and happy to answer my question. The caseworker that dealing with my case went on holiday yet by case did not suffer one bit. Another lawyer stepped and took over the case without any hassle.
My Tier 1 Investor Visa was dealt with quickly and without issue. Would recommend Reiss Edwards as an Immigration law firm in London. Thank you to the team.
530 ReviewsREAD ALL REVIEWS