uk immigration lawyers
uk immigration lawyers
Home / Assylum and Humanitarian Protection

Asylum, Humanitarian Protection & Refugee Applications

For these kind of applications, the applicant will have to demonstrate that he/she has a substantial fear of prosecution in their country of origin on the basis of:-

    Their ethnic background;
  • Religion;
  • Place of origin ;
  • Been a member of a social group; or
  • Your political viewpoint.

The success of asylum (Asylum, humanitarian Protection & refugees) claims in the light of the points mentioned above would normally depend on whether or not the UKVI believes in your story. If in the application, you can show that you are facing serious harm or intimidation, you chances of success are enhanced. Importantly, a refusal of your application by the Home Office can still be challenged by way of an appeal; and that also would depend if the application is certified or not.

In some cases, the Home Office may certify the application as clearly unfounded. What this mean is that the application was just submitted for the sake of it. If your application is certified, you will then have to return to your home country to appeal the decision. However, you may still be able to challenge that decision in-country through a Judicial review.

For asylum applications, the evidence of persecution doesn’t have to show that persecution currently exists, applications may still be lodged if there is a possibility that persecution will occur as a result of the points mentioned above.

Claims are usually argued on the basis of your rights under the Human Rights Convention of the EC (ECHR). The convention states that you have a right to be free from all forms of torture, cruelty as well as treatments that are humiliating. It further asserts your right to privacy and family life.

Where as a result of your religious beliefs, place of origin, membership of a social group or your worldview, certain persons or government act to deny your rights under the ECHR, you may be able to make a successful asylum claim.

If your application is successful, your entry clearance application will normally be granted for 5 years in in line with the terms of protection that you seek. If you have remained in the country for over 5 years as an asylum seeker, refugee or person seeking humanitarian protection, you may be eligible for settlement (Indefinite Leave to remain).

Please note that your status as a refugee or an asylum seeker will be lost if you go back to the country you claim to be fleeing. You are not expected be away from the UK for a period exceeding 2 years or break the law in the UK; your asylum, refugee or humanitarian status will be lost if you do so.

Asylum Claims

Asylum is a protection given by a country to individuals who have fled their country of origin for fear of being persecuted is known as Asylum. However for an individual to be identified as a refugee he must have fled his country of origin and cannot return due to a justifiable fear of persecution; this is established under the United Nations Convention of 1951, which relates to the Status of Refugees.

The commitment of the United Kingdom to the European Convention on Human Rights makes it necessary that the British authorities do not send individuals to a country where there is a possibility of them being exposed to inhuman treatments such as torture, punishment etc. on their return.

In a situation where by the asylum seeker does not meet the requirements to be granted Asylum, the applicant may be allowed to reside in the UK on a temporary permission to remain on the basis that the Secretary of State has perceived humanitarian or other reasons as to why the Home Office should reconsider the situation.

An Asylum applicant in accordance with the Immigration Rules is an individual who:

  • Has requested recognition as a refugee under the Geneva Convention on the condition that if required to be remove from or leave the UK, it will be a violation of the obligation held by the UK under the Geneva Convention. Or;
  • Has made an “application for Asylum” requesting international protection.

Meanwhile every individual is permitted to apply for Asylum in their own interest.

Criteria For Grant Of Asylum

For an individual to be granted Asylum, the Secretary of State has to be satisfied on some issues in accordance to the Immigration Rules. These issues are:

  • That the individual is present in the United Kingdom or has arrived at any official port of entry
  • That the individual is a refugee as identified in the regulation 2 of the Refugee or Person in Need of International Protection (Qualification) Regulation 2006.
  • That there is no real reason to consider the individual as a threat to the Security of the UK.
  • That the individual having been convicted of a severe offence, does not constitute danger to the United Kingdom community
  • That by refusing the individual’s application, he would be demanded to leave the UK immediately or when he has elapse his leave to remain; which would be a violation of the Geneva Convention because the individual will face threats on account of nationality, political affiliation, race, religion etc. on his return to the country.

An individual might have a justifiable fear for persecution and harm on the basis of the occurrences that had happened since the individual’s departure from the country of origin, and/or on the other hand, the activities that the individual has been engaged in since the departure from the country of origin, especially if these activities aids in the continued arraignment and incarcerations as well as orientation occurring in the country of origin.

Unaccompanied Children

Children without the company of legal guardians may apply for asylum if there is a possibility they will face endangerment; their cases are treated as priority and with serious concern by the Home Office. In spite of the fact that it is stated in the Immigration Rules that any individuals of any age may be qualified for being granted asylum as contained under the Convention, that the rules applies equally to all applicants . The maturity of the individual is considered whilst assessing the claim of the individual; but in the case of the minors, priority is placed on factual evidence of risk rather than the child’s mental state and perception of his situation. If an asylum application is made on behalf of the minor, The Home Office is obliged to always pay close attention to the well-being of the child instead of making a decision based on the child’s age, his ability to understand his situation or his capability to have a justifiable fear of persecution.

Any Minor over the age of 12, who has as a result of his own claims formally requested for Asylum, he/she is scheduled for an Interview by the Home Office Immigration Officer so as to obtain the validity of the claim. Only in circumstances where the child is unable or is in poor condition to be interviewed is the child not interviewed. The interview is conducted in the presence of parent, guardian or another adult person independent of the Secretary of State who is responsible for the child. There is always a great tendency that the child during the course of the interview might feel shy or frightened which makes it necessary that the interviewer be a professional in handling such issues, the child will however be allowed to express himself in the way he feels most comfortable and at the time he wishes to. The interviewer is therefore bound to stop the interview if the child shows sign of exhaustion or distress.

Transfer Of Refugee Status

Individuals of refugee status who have been offered Asylum by another country are under obligation to submit to the standard immigration control. In some exceptional cases, the UK assumes responsibility for the protection of the individual and as such offer him/her leave to remain as Refugees in the UK.

Individuals who are identified by the UNHCR as refugees under its mandate (i.e. mandate refugees not conventional refugees) who have not been offered asylum by a country are not permitted to apply for a transfer of refugee status.

Individuals who have been recognized as refugees in another country but still wishes to enter the UK as Refugees can do so by any of these two options:

  • By making an application transferring their refugee status from the Host country to the United Kingdom; or
  • By making a claim for Asylum on the basis of fear of persecution in the host country if he still fears persecution in that country.

For a transfer of refugee status under the first option above, it will involve consideration outside the rules under the discretion of the secretary of state. On the other hand, an Asylum claim will fail to be taken into consideration under the immigration Rules in the Second point like every other claim for Asylum but will also be liable for consideration under the removal procedure of the Safe Third Country. More so, some applications will fail being considered because of the United Kingdom’s commitment under the European Agreement on the Transfer of Responsibility for Refugees (EATRR), and the existence of a formal consent of validity to the EATRR by the country that acknowledged the applicant as a refugee. Please note that the European Agreement on the Transfer of Responsibility for Refugees (EATRR) is a council of Europe Agreement and is not a part of the domestic laws of the UK.


There are few criteria through which the UK will agree to transfer of responsibility for a refugee in agreement with the EATRR, granting him/her leave to remain. These criteria are:

  • That the individual is legally resided in the UK on the condition that he/she is not an illegal emigrant or have not illegally stayed beyond permitted time; and is not making the application abroad or at a port.
  • That the individual has under the 1951 convention or the 1967 Protocol by one of the other countries that has formally consented the EATRR; been granted the status of a refugee.
  • That there has been an event of transfer of responsibility.
Deemed transfer of responsibility under the EATRR

Transfer of responsible of an applicant will be considered to have occurred if in addition to the first two of the above conditions, the following criteria below are fulfilled:

  • The individual in accordance to the authorities has successfully spent two years continuously in the UK;
  • In accordance with the authorities in this circumstance means:
    • With leave, apart from the leave in any of the excluded categories listed below:
    • Waiting for the UKBA’s decision on the application for leave rather than any of the excluded categories listed below.
  • The addition to the qualifying period in this category is all visits the applicant has made to other countries for less than three months in succession or six months in total.
  1. The time an individual spends incarcerated due to being convicted for criminal offences or an unresolved appeal against an immigration decision which was dismissed eventually do not count as part of the two years qualifying period.
  2. Leave of entry granted for the primary purpose of studying, receiving treatment or training is part of the excluded categories which will not count as part of the two year qualifying period; whereas, leaves in order categories will not be excluded and as such will be.
  3. Any leave awarded to the applying individual, which will grant him/her permanent residence in the UK like in circumstance where the individual has been granted permanent leave to remain; the individual is not entitled to apply in this category.
  4. If the individual has been authorised to reside in the United Kingdom beyond the validity of travel document issued by the host country. Given the authority to reside should be explained within the context of the advice on with the agreement of the authorities” as stated above. More so, this condition will not be met in these circumstances:
    • That the extension was authorised mainly for the purpose of study or training;
    • That the involved individuals can still reenter to the host country. If the UK requests re-admission in the space of six months within which the applicant’s conventional travel document expired, the applicant will be re-admissible to the Home country. In a situation where the locations of the individual are not defined in a way that the for application to reenter the Home country cannot be done within six months of the travel document’s expiry especially in situations where the individual is an illegal entrant; this request however might be made within six months of the individual’s being noticed by the authorities of the UK, in as much as it is within two years of expiry of the travel document.

If an application is not refused under the EATRR, the application will also be considered under the discretionary basis outside of the EATRR.

Discretionary Cases

The reasons why some applications for the transfer of refugee status does not fall under the EATRR provision is because the individual has been acknowledged as a refugee by a country that has not signed the EATRR, or for the reason that the refugee does not fulfill the term of the EATRR. On these aspects, consideration should be distinctive by treating each case uniquely.

The responsibility for such situation should not be transferred on the basis that the applicant just wishes to reside in the UK; rather it should be accepted if the United Kingdom is the most suitable place for long term refuge of the applicant.

These applications should be done at a British diplomatic post in another country, a port or within the UK. Interviews in this case are not necessary determinants for the refusal of an applicant’s application. Furthermore, if the Case worker is uncertain about any aspect of the individual’s application, he may schedule an interview in order to clarify issues and as well gather more information.

While the caseworkers evaluates these applications, certain factors comes to bear, these are:

  • The length of time an individual spent in the first country of stay in comparison with the length of time spent in the UK.
  • The strength of family ties or other affiliations the individual has with the host country compared with the UK; and
  • Sympathetic circumstances that will evoke irresistible interest or attention.

Legacy Cases

Before July 2011, asylum claims that have been made before 05-03-07 and had been ‘unresolved’, which meant that there were still actions pending on their cases, were now having their cases resolved. The criteria here were more lenient than under the main immigration rules.

Practically we saw that people who would normally not get Indefinite leave to remain where now getting Indefinite leave to remain based on Article 8. Note that this was not necessarily a case where the floodgates were open to everyone who had a pending application, there were still migrants who were removed from the UK under the legacy cases provisions. However majority of the decisions normally led to ILR.

Importantly the Home Office have not specified the criteria upon which legacy cases are been decided. This presents a case for arbitrariness. How is it that one person gets ILR and the other person doesn’t? This therefore presents point of law for solicitors to scrutinise decisions in line with similar cases in the court of law.

Issues under legacy cases include matters relating to refusal of Indefinite leave to remain application under 10 years long residence and/or article 8 issues, delays in making decisions, granting discretionary leaves rather than Indefinite Leaves to remain and so much more.

What are Legacy Cases?

The UKBA have offer very little information on Legacy cases, making it relatively difficult to come up with an encompassing definition that is accurately defines Legacy in meaning and accuracy. The best definitions however will include outstanding cases where asylum claims have been made at some point but has not been considered under the New Asylum Model. Where outstanding cases refer to cases where applicants have not been granted leaves but remain resident in the UK.


The Case Resolution Directorate (CRD) of the United Kingdom Border Agency has been able to conclude an analysis of older asylum cases (also called Legacy cases). Though a small number of these cases have been analysed, the conclusions of the cases are still being expected. Examples of such expectant conclusion cases include:

  • Cases expecting prosecution;
  • Cases expecting removal (inclusive of a few cases that require additional casework before concluding removal action is taken);
  • Cases still in process of legal proceedings; and
  • Cases where the CRD could not track down the applicant and as a result have placed the case in a controlled archive.

Please note that this list is not exhaustive.

However, due to the quality of data at the time of making the asylum application, some cases have been omitted from the original CRD review.

Case Assurance And Audit Unit (CAAU)

For a case to be considered by the Case Assurance and Audit Unit (CAAU), the UKBA would have contacted the applicant and removed their case from the controlled archive. In a situation where contacting the applicant was not possible by the CRD, there is a probability that the case was placed in the controlled archive.

Discretionary Leave on the basis of a rejected asylum claim

An individual, who has been offered Discretionary Leave to remain in the United Kingdom on the basis of been rejected an asylum claim application, such a person can make an application to extend a Discretionary Leave by completing the DL application form.

An individual, who has been initially offered Discretionary Leave to remain in the UK as a result of the rejection of his/her asylum claim application and then extension of the same application for an additional 3 years, can make an application for Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) when he/she has completely elapsed 6 years in the UK. This application for Indefinite Leave to Remain is also to be made by completing and submitting the DL application form.

ILR - Humanitarian Protection

In a situation whereby an individual do not meet the criteria to be granted refugee status in the UK, but is in need of protection; he/she might be granted Humanitarian Protection. The Humanitarian protection is granted if the individual on his return to the country of return faces serious risk of life or person, which could arise from:

  • the death penalty;
  • unlawful killing; or
  • torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

If you are in a situation where you are fleeing your country of nationality as a result of persecution, you may be able to seek Humanitarian Protection from the government of the United Kingdom.

Please note that this area of law is very complex and it is very important to seek legal advice if you want looking to proceed on this route. It is also important to inform you that public funding or what is known as legal aid is available for both asylum and humanitarian protection applications.

There is a significant difference between an asylum and a refugee protection. Even though, the definition of what a protection claim is revolves around a claim that acting to remove the claimant from the UK would be in breach of the UK’s obligation under the Refugee, other firms of protection include: -

  • Article 3 protection
  • Protection on the basis of statelessness
  • Protection for those who have been subjected to trafficking

Difference between Asylum and Humanitarian protection

Asylum has 5 conventional reasons. So you can only claim asylum on 5 grounds

  1. Nationality
  2. Race
  3. Religion
  4. Member of a particular social group
  5. Political or imputed political opinion

Humanitarian protection is a claim where you don’t have a conventional reason but you can still nonetheless establish that there is a real risk of serious harm to your life of safety.

Essentially, they both mean the same thing, whereas one is specific the other is more generic. You cannot claim asylum if it is not under any of the conventional reasons (stated above) however, if you still need international protection, you can apply for protection on humanitarian basis.

More importantly, the Home Office considers them interchangeable.

If an application for humanitarian protection is granted, the applicant will normally be granted leave for 3 years. Having completed 5 years under humanitarian protection in the UK, you may qualify for settlement. It is important to note that settlement is not grated automatically just because you have spent 5 years, you will need to show that you continue to need humanitarian protection or can justify your grant of further leave.

If you require legal assistance on this matter, please contact one of our immigration solicitors today for a free consultation.

Indefinite Leave To Remain (ILR) As A Refugee

The Indefinite Leave to Remain as a refugee application can be submitted to the Home Office, UKBA on the foundation of the 5 years of residing in the UK as an acknowledged refugee; as is contained under the 1951 United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. This application should be made using the Form SET (Protection) and submitted to the Home Office, UKBA within 30 days from the date at which your leave to remain in the UK as a refugee expired.

Late application will lead to termination of your authorized leave to remain as a refugee in the UK; the Home office, UKBA will then carryout a critical review of your case, which may lead to the revoking of your status, and your removal from the UK. Note that there is no Home Office fee attached to the SET (Protection) application form.

It is important to note that the migrant is now required to undergo an official review after 5 years in order to obtain Indefinite Leave to remain under this route. This development was greeted with a lot reservations as it implied kicking refugees back to the countries they flee. Understanding that the Home Office granted their initial refugee application on the basis that they had shown that they were indeed fleeing persecution or conflict adds a different perspective to this.

Maurice Wren, Refugee council’s chief opined that this would effectively be tantamount to the Home Office issuing a death certificate to these refugees and that the government should be more sensitive about what it really means to give protection to refugees; as this new rule goes against the very tenets of refugee protection.

It is also important to note, especially if you are looking to make the application yourself that the right form to use is the Form SET (Protection Route), this can be downloaded from the Home Office website. Submitting with the wrong form will result in your application been returned as invalid.

Also, there is no extra fee payable when applying for indefinite leave to remain or settlement under this route. You should also endeavour to retain a copy of your immigration status document before submitting the form as well as any associated document by registered post.

Should you need any immigration help, please speak to one of our immigration lawyers today for a free consultation.

Generally, applications would normally take 6 months, however this date may vary depending on the volume of application at the Home Office. Currently 95% of applications are processed within 6 months. It is also important to note that your records will be checked with the police. Persons with strong convictions are likely to have issues especially when applying for a passport.

Asylum, Humanitarian Protection & Refugees Frequently asked questions (FAQ)

Immigration Enquiry

subscribe to email and newsletters
Reiss Edwards Reviews
5 out of 5 stars 312 Google+ Reviews
reivew immigration lawyer

Our Brochure

Reiss Edwards immigration lawyers brochure

Arabic Brochure
Reiss Edwards immigration lawyers brochure

Immigration related Testimonials

Investing over 2 million pounds is defintely not a routine decision. We had to make sure that the Tier 1 investor immigration lawyers london that we would be picking has to be one of the best within the Tier 1 investor category. We contacted Reiss Edwards and they were able to get us not only the Tier 1 investor visa but also suggested profitable investment portfolios in addition to what we already had in mind.
The Home Office refused my Tier 1 Entrepreneur extension application. This meant that my family and i would have to go back to Jordan and my business would close down. I needed a good immigration lawyer to put in a very strong appeal. I approached Reiss Edwards based on a friend's recommendation and they put together a very strong appeal. I read the grounds of appeal and I knew that this was a winner. A big thanks to Joe who worked tireless on my appeal.
I am glad that i instructed Reiss Edwards on my visa matter.

It started with a 20 minutes free immigration advice. I met with Amar to discuss my ILR refusal. He gave me a great deal of quality advice and decided to take on my messy case. I had doubts on the merits of my case by he was relatively convinced he could win it. That made me quite secure.

To be honest, things did not start as quick as I would have wanted, but they kept on communicating the process and state of things to me

A big thank you to Verusha and Foram. They were also very helpful. Brilliant and informative.

Their fee was fair and reasonable, especially if you compare them to other law firms and immigration law firms in London; some of whom even told me that i would not be able to get an indefinte leave to remain in this country.

The process was long but was worth it. In the end, a big thank you to Reiss Edwards.
I have just had British Citizenship application approved. Prior to making the application, i was not sure which law firm i should hire to facilitate the paperwork. After a few hours of research, i decided to go with Reiss Edwards and i must confess that i wasnt disappointed.

The immigration lawyers at Reiss Edwards handled my case well and they really knew what they were doing. They were fully aware of what documents I needed and it was easy for them to tell if my case was going to be easy or not.

At the end of the day, I have not received my British citizenship within 3 months.

If anyone is looking for a good immigration lawyer to handle thier case, contact Reiss Edwards.
Fantastic Solicitors!!!

My wife's spouse visa extension application was refused by the Home Office and they gave her 14 days to leave the country. We contacted Reiss Edwards and they said "OK don't worry we will sort this out". They put together the list of documents for me to obtain and they prepared a bundle which was as thick as the printer it came out from.

We followed everything they asked us to do and in the end we won our appeal and got our spouse visa.

We can't recommend them enough and we have promised ourselves never to make any more UK visa applications without them.
The team of lawyers at Reiss Edwards are very professional and friendly people. Their experience in and around UK immigration law is quite extensive; be sure that you application is in safe and competent hands. My immigration matter was an indefinite leave to remain application based on Tier 1 on a self-employment basis. The immigration lawyers at Reiss Edwards made sure that the application was perfect and ready to be accepted. I got a positive decision and I recommend them highly for anyone who needs a UK immigration help.
This is the only firm that i spoke with that didn't ask for money before listening to me, will be using them again.
I used Reiss Edwards for my Tier 2 visa application and it was successful. The team was ever present and happy to answer my question.

The caseworker that dealing with my case went on holiday yet by case did not suffer one bit. Another lawyer stepped and took over the case without any hassle.
My Tier 1 Investor Visa was dealt with quickly and without issue. Would recommend Reiss Edwards as an Immigration law firm in London. Thank you to the team.
I contacted Reiss Edwards to help me with my wife’s UK settlement visa. They acted with utmost professionalism throughout the entire application. I spoke with Joe Dinh, he is an immigration solicitor and he is one of the best solicitors out there. He ensured that there was little to no room for error. At some point I thought he was over cautious. He remained calmed and continued to assure us on our immigration matter. Most people in his position would have panicked but he was calmed and continued to assure us. We received out positive outcome very quickly.

Click to view all google reviews
I have been using Reiss Edwards for three years now for my family's immigration application. Both for my initial application and extension. They are really affordable. The team of solicitors at this firm are probably one of the most efficient and economical in terms of cost. They offered free advice over the phone and spent good time with us before inviting us for consultation.

Click to view all google reviews
Reiss Edwards is a top notch immigration service company. The way they handled our documentation and also the list of documents they sent was efficient and top quality. They helped us professionally throughout the process. We are very happy with the immigration advice we received from the team. We highly recommend them.

Click to view all google reviews
I used Reiss Edwards’ immigration lawyers to assist with my immigration matter and that of my family. It was an EX1 application. They dealt with the matter properly and even when complications were coming up from the Home Office, they helped resolve the issue properly. They are very professional and are very popular in London. I am happy to have worked with them.

Click to view all google reviews
It's a shame that you dont have an 'Excellent' star rating on here, as my experience with Reiss Edwards is nothing short of an excellent rating. They handled my application for an Indefinite Leave to remain in April 2014 and did my husband's one very recently including my daughter. Every time i have approached them, they have continued to treat me with courtesy, respect and patience. Amar was indeed a very thorough and professional gentleman. He is very knowledgeable, corporative and engaging. He responded to my emails, calls and enquiries promptly. He was always reassuring. I could not have asked for a better Immigration service.

I would recommend them over and over again for anyone looking for an immigration advice.

They gave me a free immigration advice when i called them, and the quality of the advice was something other charge thousands for. If you need a particular, name, Amar would be it. He exemplifies, for me, the true, professional gentleman. He is a valuable asset to Reiss Edwards.

Kind regards
Nancy Jacquard

facebook icon twitter google youtube rss feed sitemap

Copyright 2017 - Immigration Lawyers London | +44(0)20 3744 2797 | | Map   | Complaint Handling | Privacy Policy | Terms