For these kinds of applications, the applicant will have to demonstrate that they have a substantial fear of prosecution in their country of origin based on:
The success of asylum (Asylum, Humanitarian Protection & Refugees) claims in the light of the points mentioned above would normally depend on whether the UKVI believes in your story. If you can show that you are facing serious harm or intimidation in your application, you chance of success will be higher. Importantly, a refusal of your application by the Home Office can still be challenged by way of an appeal, which would also depend on whether the application is certified or not.
In some cases, the Home Office may certify the application as clearly unfounded. What this means is that the application was submitted purely for the sake of it. If your application is certified, you will then have to return to your home country to appeal the decision. However, you may still be able to challenge that decision in-country through a Judicial Review.
For asylum applications, the evidence of persecution doesn't have to show that the persecution currently exists. Applications may still be lodged if there is a possibility that persecution will occur as a result of the points mentioned above.
Claims are usually argued based on your rights under the Human Rights Convention of the EC (ECHR). The convention states that you have a right to be free from all forms of torture and cruelty, as well as any other humiliating treatment. It further asserts your right to privacy and family life.
If your application is successful, your entry clearance application will normally be granted for 5 years in line with the terms of protection you need. If you have remained in the country for over 5 years as an asylum seeker, refugee or person seeking humanitarian protection, you may be eligible for settlement (Indefinite Leave to Remain).
Please note, that your status as a refugee or an asylum seeker will be lost if you go back to the country you claim to be fleeing. You are not expected be away from the UK for a period exceeding 2 years or break UK law - your asylum, refugee or humanitarian status will be lost if you do so.
Asylum is a protection given by a country to individuals who have fled their country of origin for fear of being persecuted. However, for an individual to be identified as a refugee he must have fled his country of origin and cannot return due to a justifiable fear of persecution - this is established under the United Nations Convention of 1951, which relates to the Status of Refugees.
The commitment of the UK to the European Convention on Human Rights makes it necessary for the British authorities to not send individuals to a country where there is a possibility of them being exposed to inhuman treatments such as torture, punishment etc. upon their return.
In a situation whereby the asylum seeker does not meet the requirements to be granted asylum, the applicant may be allowed to reside in the UK on a temporary permission to remain based on the Secretary of State having perceived humanitarian (or other) reasons as to why the Home Office should reconsider the situation.
An asylum applicant in accordance with the Immigration Rules is an individual who:
Meanwhile every individual is permitted to apply for Asylum in their own interest.
For an individual to be granted Asylum, the Secretary of State must be satisfied on some issues in accordance to the Immigration Rules. These issues are:
An individual might have a justifiable fear for persecution and harm on the basis of the occurrences having happened since the individual's departure from the country of origin, and/or on the other hand, the activities that the individual has been engaged in since the departure from the country of origin, especially if these activities aid in the continued arraignment and incarcerations (as well as orientation) occurring in the country of origin.
Children without the company of legal guardians may apply for asylum if there is a possibility that they will face endangerment; their cases are treated as priority and with serious concern by the Home Office. Although it is stated in the Immigration Rules that any individuals of any age may be qualified for being granted asylum as contained under the Convention, that the rules apply equally to all applicants. The maturity of the individual is considered whilst assessing the claim of the individual; but in the case of the minors, priority is placed on factual evidence of risk rather than the child's mental state and perception of their situation. If an asylum application is made on behalf of the minor, The Home Office is always obliged to pay close attention to the well-being of the child instead of deciding based on the child's age, their ability to understand their situation or their capability to have a justifiable fear of persecution.
Any minor over the age of 12, who has, as a result of their own claims, formally requested for Asylum, will be scheduled for an interview by the Home Office Immigration Officer to identify the validity of their claim. Only in circumstances where the child is unable or is in too poor a condition, the child will not be interviewed. The interview is conducted in the presence of a parent, guardian or another adult person independent of the Secretary of State who is responsible for the child. There is always a great tendency that the child during the interview might feel shy or frightened, which makes it necessary that the interviewer be a professional in handling such issues. The child will, however, be allowed to express themselves in a way which feels most comfortable and at the time which best suits them. The interviewer is therefore bound to stop the interview if the child shows sign of exhaustion or distress.
Individuals of refugee status who have been offered Asylum by another country are under obligation to submit to the standard immigration control. In some exceptional cases, the UK assumes responsibility for the protection of the individual and as such offer their leave to remain as Refugees in the UK.
Individuals who are identified by the UNHCR as refugees under its mandate (i.e. mandate refugees, as opposed to conventional refugees) who have not been offered asylum by a country are not permitted to apply for a transfer of refugee status.
Individuals who have been recognized as refugees in another country but still wish to enter the UK as refugees can do so by any of these two options:
For a transfer of refugee status under the first option above, it will involve consideration outside the rules under the discretion of the secretary of state. On the other hand, an Asylum claim will fail to be taken into consideration under the Immigration Rules in the second point like every other claim for Asylum but will also be liable for consideration under the removal procedure of the Safe Third Country. More so, some applications will not be considered because of the UK's commitment under the European Agreement on the Transfer of Responsibility for Refugees (EATRR), and the existence of a formal consent of validity to the EATRR by the country that acknowledged the applicant as a refugee. Please note, that the European Agreement on the Transfer of Responsibility for Refugees (EATRR) is a council of Europe Agreement and is not a part of the domestic laws of the UK.
There are few criteria through which the UK will agree to transfer of responsibility for a refugee in agreement with the EATRR, granting them leave to remain.
These criteria are as follows:
Deemed Transfer of Responsibility under the EATRR
Transfer of responsibility of an applicant will be considered to have occurred if, in addition to the first two of the above conditions, the following criteria below are fulfilled:
If an application is not refused under the EATRR, the application will also be considered under the discretionary basis outside of the EATRR.
The reasons why some applications for the transfer of refugee status does not fall under the EATRR provision is because the individual has been acknowledged as a refugee by a country that has not signed the EATRR, or because the refugee does not fulfil the terms of the EATRR. On these aspects, consideration should be distinctive by treating each case uniquely.
The responsibility for such situation should not be transferred on the basis that the applicant just wishes to reside in the UK; rather it should be accepted if the UK is the most suitable place for long term refuge of the applicant.
These applications should be done at a British diplomatic post in another country, a port or within the UK. Interviews in this case are not necessary determinants for the refusal of an applicant's application. Furthermore, if the caseworker is uncertain about any aspect of the individual's application, they may schedule an interview to clarify issues, as well as gather more information.
While the caseworkers evaluate these applications, certain factors come into play. These are as follows:
Before July 2011, asylum claims that have been made before 05-03-07 and had been 'unresolved', which meant that there were still actions pending on their cases, were now having their cases resolved. The criteria here were more lenient than under the main immigration rules.
We saw that people who would normally not get Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) were now getting ILR based on Article 8. Note that this was not necessarily a case where the floodgates were open to everyone who had a pending application, as there were still migrants who were removed from the UK under the legacy cases provisions. However, the majority of the decisions normally led to ILR.
Importantly, the Home Office have not specified the criteria upon which legacy cases are being decided. This presents a case for arbitrariness. How it is that one person gets ILR and the other person does not? This presents point of law for solicitors to scrutinise decisions in line with similar cases in the court of law.
Issues under legacy cases include matters relating to a refusal of ILR applications under 10 years long residence and/or article 8 issues, delays in making decisions, granting discretionary leaves rather than ILR, and so much more.
The UKBA have offered very little information on Legacy cases, making it relatively difficult to come up with an encompassing definition which accurately defines Legacy in meaning and accuracy. The best definitions however will include outstanding cases where asylum claims have been made at some point but has not been considered under the New Asylum Model. Where outstanding cases refer to cases where applicants have not been granted leaves but remain resident in the UK.
Case Resolution Directorate (CRD)?
The Case Resolution Directorate (CRD) of the United Kingdom Border Agency has been able to conclude an analysis of older asylum cases (also called Legacy cases). Though a small number of these cases have been analysed, the conclusions of the cases are still being expected.
Examples of such expectant conclusion cases include:
Please note that this list is not exhaustive.
However, due to the quality of data at the time of making the asylum application, some cases have been omitted from the original CRD review.
Case Assurance and Audit Unit (CAAU)
For a case to be considered by the Case Assurance and Audit Unit (CAAU), the UKBA would have contacted the applicant and removed their case from the controlled archive. In a situation where contacting the applicant was not possible by the CRD, there is a probability that the case was placed in the controlled archive.
An individual, who has been offered Discretionary Leave to remain in the UK because they were rejected an asylum claim application, can make an application to extend a Discretionary Leave by completing the DL application form.
An individual, who has been initially offered Discretionary Leave to remain in the UK as a result of the rejection of their asylum claim application and then extension of the same application for an additional 3 years, can make an application for ILR when they have completely elapsed 6 years in the UK. This application for ILR can also be made by completing and submitting the DL application form.
In a situation whereby an individual does not meet the criteria to be granted refugee status in the UK but needs protection, they can be granted Humanitarian Protection. The Humanitarian Protection is granted if the individual on his return to the country faces serious risk of life or person, which could arise from:
If you are in a situation where you are fleeing your country of nationality as a result of persecution, you may be able to seek Humanitarian Protection from the UK government.
Please note that this area of law is very complex, and it is very important to seek legal advice if you want to proceed on this route. It is also important to inform you that public funding (or what is known as legal aid) is available for both asylum and humanitarian protection applications.
There is a significant difference between an asylum and a refugee protection. However, the definition of what a protection claim is revolves around a claim that acting to remove the claimant from the UK would be in breach of the UK's obligation under the refugee.
Other firms of protection include:
Asylum has 5 conventional reasons. You can only claim asylum on 5 grounds:
Humanitarian protection is a claim where you don't have a conventional reason, but you can still establish that there is a real risk of serious harm to your life or safety.
Essentially, they both mean the same thing - one is specific while the other is more generic. You cannot claim asylum if it is not under any of the conventional reasons (stated above) - however, if you still need international protection, you can apply for protection on a humanitarian basis.
More importantly, the Home Office considers them interchangeable.
If an application for humanitarian protection is granted, the applicant will normally be granted leave for 3 years. Having completed 5 years under humanitarian protection in the UK, you may qualify for settlement. It is important to note that settlement is not granted automatically just because you have spent 5 years - you must show that you continue needing humanitarian protection or can justify your grant of further leave.
The ILR as a refugee application can be submitted to the Home Office, UKBA on the foundation of the 5 years of residing in the UK as an acknowledged refugee, as is contained under the 1951 United Nations Convention Relating to the status of refugees. This application should be made using the Form SET (Protection) and submitted to the Home Office, UKBA within 30 days from the date at which your leave to remain in the UK as a refugee expired.
Late application will lead to termination of your authorized leave to remain as a refugee in the UK; the Home office, UKBA will then carry out a critical review of your case, which may lead to the revocation of your status, and your removal from the UK. Note that there is no Home Office fee attached to the SET (Protection) application form.
It is important to note that the migrant is now required to undergo an official review after 5 years to obtain ILR under this route. This development was met with reservation as it implies kicking refugees back to the countries they were fleeing from. Understanding that the Home Office granted their initial refugee application based on having shown that they were indeed fleeing persecution or conflict adds a different perspective.
Maurice Wren, the Refugee council's chief, opined that this would effectively be tantamount to the Home Office issuing a death certificate to these refugees and that the government should be more sensitive about what it really means to grant them protection, with this new rule (in principle) going against the core tenets of refugee protection.
It is also important to note, especially if you are looking to make the application yourself, that the right form to use is the Form SET (Protection Route) - this can be downloaded from the Home Office website. Submitting the wrong form will result in your application being returned as invalid.
Also, there is no extra fee payable when applying for ILR or settlement under this route. You should also endeavour to retain a copy of your immigration status document before submitting the form, as well as any associated document by registered post.
Generally, applications would take around 6 months. However, this date may vary depending on the volume of applications at the Home Office. Currently 95% of applications are processed within 6 months. It is also important to note that your records will be checked with the police. Persons with strong convictions are likely to have issues especially when applying for a passport. Should you need any immigration help, please speak to one of our immigration solicitors today for a free consultation.
It's a shame that you dont have an 'Excellent' star rating on here, as my experience with Reiss Edwards is nothing short of an excellent rating. They handled my application for an Indefinite Leave to remain in April 2014 and did my husband's one very recently including my daughter. Every time i have approached them, they have continued to treat me with courtesy, respect and patience. Amar was indeed a very thorough and professional gentleman. He is very knowledgeable, corporative and engaging. He responded to my emails, calls and enquiries promptly. He was always reassuring. I could not have asked for a better Immigration service. I would recommend them over and over again for anyone looking for an immigration advice. They gave me a free immigration advice when i called them, and the quality of the advice was something other charge thousands for. If you need a particular, name, Amar would be it. He exemplifies, for me, the true, professional gentleman. He is a valuable asset to Reiss Edwards.
I am glad that i instructed Reiss Edwards on my visa matter. It started with a 20 minutes free immigration advice. I met with Amar to discuss my ILR refusal. He gave me a great deal of quality advice and decided to take on my messy case. I had doubts on the merits of my case by he was relatively convinced he could win it. That made me quite secure. To be honest, things did not start as quick as I would have wanted, but they kept on communicating the process and state of things to me.A big thank you to Verusha and Foram. They were also very helpful. Brilliant and informative. Their fee was fair and reasonable, especially if you compare them to other law firms and immigration law firms in London; some of whom even told me that i would not be able to get an indefinte leave to remain in this country. The process was long but was worth it. In the end, a big thank you to Reiss Edwards.
Investing over 2 million pounds is defintely not a routine decision. We had to make sure that the Tier 1 investor immigration lawyers that we'd be picking has to be one of the best within the Tier 1 investor category. We contacted Reiss Edwards and they were able to get us not only the Tier 1 investor visa but also suggested profitable investment portfolios in addition to what we already had in mind.
TI have just had British Citizenship application approved. Prior to making the application, i was not sure which law firm i should hire to facilitate the paperwork. After a few hours of research, i decided to go with Reiss Edwards and i must confess that i wasnt disappointed. The immigration lawyers at Reiss Edwards handled my case well and they really knew what they were doing. They were fully aware of what documents I needed and it was easy for them to tell if my case was going to be easy or not. At the end of the day, I have not received my British citizenship within 3 months. If anyone is looking for a good immigration lawyer to handle thier case, contact Reiss Edwards.
My wife's spouse visa extension application was refused by the Home Office and they gave her 14 days to leave the country. We contacted Reiss Edwards and they said "OK don't worry we will sort this out". They put together the list of documents for me to obtain and they prepared a bundle which was as thick as the printer it came out from.We followed everything they asked us to do and in the end we won our appeal and got our spouse visa. We can't recommend them enough and we have promised ourselves never to make any more UK visa applications without them.
The team of lawyers at Reiss Edwards are very professional and friendly people. Their experience in and around UK immigration law is quite extensive; be sure that you application is in safe and competent hands. My immigration matter was an indefinite leave to remain application based on Tier 1 on a self-employment basis. The immigration lawyers at Reiss Edwards made sure that the application was perfect and ready to be accepted. I got a positive decision and I recommend them highly for anyone who needs a UK immigration help.
I contacted Reiss Edwards to help me with my wife's UK settlement visa. They acted with utmost professionalism throughout the entire application. I spoke with Joe Dinh, he is an immigration solicitor and he is one of the best solicitors out there. He ensured that there was little to no room for error. At some point I thought he was over cautious. He remained calmed and continued to assure us on our immigration matter. Most people in his position would have panicked but he was calmed and continued to assure us. We received out positive outcome very quickly.
I have been using Reiss Edwards for three years now for my family's immigration application. Both for my initial application and extension. They are really affordable. The team of solicitors at this firm are probably one of the most efficient and economical in terms of cost. They offered free advice over the phone and spent good time with us before inviting us for consultation.
Reiss Edwards is a top notch immigration service company. The way they handled our documentation and also the list of documents they sent was efficient and top quality. They helped us professionally throughout the process. We are very happy with the immigration advice we received from the team. We highly recommend them.
I used Reiss Edwards immigration lawyers to assist with my immigration matter and that of my family. It was an EX1 application. They dealt with the matter properly and even when complications were coming up from the Home Office, they helped resolve the issue properly. They are very professional and are very popular in London. I am happy to have worked with them.
This is the only firm that i spoke with that didn't ask for money before listening to me, will be using them again.
I used Reiss Edwards for my Tier 2 visa application and it was successful. The team was ever present and happy to answer my question. The caseworker that dealing with my case went on holiday yet by case did not suffer one bit. Another lawyer stepped and took over the case without any hassle.
My Tier 1 Investor Visa was dealt with quickly and without issue. Would recommend Reiss Edwards as an Immigration law firm in London. Thank you to the team.
530 ReviewsREAD ALL REVIEWS