Start typing and hit "Enter" to search.

Children Get Successfully Sponsored

Our client, who was a sponsor of 3 children living abroad, was refused settlement Visa by UKVI to join. Thanks to Reiss Edwards Immigration Lawyers that helped won the appeal Read more

Get In Touch

Some of our Happy Clients
  • immigration solicitors near me
  • immigration solicitors near me
  • immigration solicitors near me
  • immigration solicitors near me

Our client was the brother-in-law and Sponsor for 3 minor children living abroad. The eldest of the 3 children suffers from both mental and physical disabilities.

The children’s mother passed away days after giving birth to the youngest of the children in 2011 and were thereafter raised by their father. However, their father also passed away unexpectantly in September 2014. Consequently, they were raised by their eldest sister and the Sponsor abroad.

The eldest sister became pregnant in October 2014 and the Sponsor initially returned to the United Kingdom in order to seek employment (as his employment contract had reached its term) in order to continue to financially support the family. The eldest sister entered the United Kingdom in February 2017.

An application for the 3 children to join the Sponsor and their eldest sister in the United Kingdom was submitted under Paragraph 297 of the Immigration Rules and in particular on the basis of-

One parent or a relative is present and settled in the United Kingdom or being admitted on the same occasion for settlement and there are serious and compelling family or other considerations which makes exclusions of the child undesirable and suitable arrangements have been made for the child’s care

However, this application was refused by the Entry Clearance Officer (‘ECO’) on 15 January 2019. The ECO relied on the following reasons in order to justify the refusal-

  1. That the children could continue to live alone without the Sponsor and their eldest sister and therefore there did not exist any serious and compelling circumstances.
  2. The eldest sister was not a British national and therefore was not eligible to be a Sponsor for the children’s application under Paragraph 297 of the Immigration Rules.

Reiss Edwards represented the children (through the Sponsor) in their appeal. The Grounds of Appeal sought to plead the following-

  1. That the children’s brother-in-law was entitled to be the Sponsor as he fell within the definition of a ‘relative’. The Immigration Rules at Paragraph 6, did not seek to provide a legal definition to the term Relative and as a consequence it was pleaded that an ordinary meaning should be applied. It therefore followed that Paragraph 297 of the Immigration Rules was in fact the correct legal provisions to be applied to the children’s application.
  2. The family remained a unit notwithstanding the fact that the Sponsor and their eldest sister had moved to the United Kingdom.
  3. That the children’s circumstances, made no better by the eldest child’s physical and mental disabilities were in fact sufficient to amount to serious and compelling circumstances.

Supporting documents including inter alia: detailed statements from the Sponsor and their eldest sister, evidence of the ongoing support provided between the Sponsor/their eldest sister and the children and witness evidence was adduced to evidence the submissions made.


The matter proceeded to the First-Tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (‘FTT’) and was heard by Judge of the FTT Black on 23 August 2019. The children’s appeal was duly allowed by way of a Determination promulgated on 11 September 2019.

The preliminary issue to this appeal was whether or not the Sponsor, as a brother-in-law fell within the definition of a ‘Relative’ and therefore entitled to be a Sponsor in the first instance.

The Judge accepted Reiss Edwards’ submission that no legal definition was provided for the term Relative. The Judge therefore accepted that a brother-in-law did fall within the ordinary definition of a relative for the purpose of an application made under paragraph 297 of the Immigration Rules.

Thereafter, it was accepted that the family unit remained intact and had not been dissolved simply by virtue of the Sponsor and the eldest sister relocating to the United Kingdom. It was further accepted that the children were living alone but under the guidance of the Sponsor and their eldest sister. These reasons along with the fact that the eldest child’s disability meant that the circumstances were compelling and undesirable.


There are a number of findings in this appeal, that Reiss Edwards is proud of-

  1. The appeal confirmed that the definition of the term Relative should not be construed as being the same as a ‘Family Member’ which is defined by the Immigration Rules.
  2. Physical separation is not an indication that an independent family unit has been established. This is important as the Home Office/ECO tends to prefer to maintain the status quo in relation to applications involving children.

With the help of our Immigration solicitors, the children have since been granted settlement visas and are now preparing to relocate to the United Kingdom where they can be reunited with their de facto parents and enjoy the stability and care that all children deserve.

Reiss Edwards Awards


Reiss Edwards is absolutely amazing. As a lawyer myself I can categorically say that they know their stuff, gentle, responsive, care about you and not just about the money, very professional.

I mean I can go on and on! The entire team at Reiss Edwards is amazing!

Kiran Sardar

I found Joe very helpful and tremendous patience which is a must in this professional as there are lots of emotions always involved in each and every case.

The way they dealt with my case during COVID19 Situation is highly appreciable. I would definitely recommend Joe D. and Anna F. Anna is an amazing lady, her patience is beyond my words.

Her hard work and professionalism have no boundaries. She is the right person for all type of cases.

Thanks to Anna and Joe for all your support and guidance which helped me fulfill my dream.

I would say Reiss Edwards is lucky to have Joe D. and Anna F. Great job Reiss Edwards.

thanks once again. Anna you’re a Gem and a Star.

Cheyam Shaked

"Anna Foley was the lawyer helping my partner obtain an EEA EFM visa. She was outstanding. Handling the case with constant correspondence over a lengthy, lockdown delayed 7-month application process. Her expert advice guided us successfully through some difficult times as a result of COVID-19. Some of the best service I have received for any service ever! Often replying to emails late at night, offering to send additional correspondence to the home office and going above and beyond in handling our case! Well done and thank you Reiss Edwards and thank you Anna!!".

Isaac .T

"Professional service. I was very impressed with the fact that my ILR application was successful 6 weeks after the submission amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. I also think the portfolio put together by the team at Reiss Edwards has played a big part in the quick turnaround of my application".

Reiss Edwards Reviews


"Andy Tieu is absolutely amazing, as a lawyer myself I can categorically say tha...

Read More

Kiran Sardar

"I found Joe very helpful and tremendous patience which is a must in this profes...

Read More

Cheyam Shaked

"Anna Foley was the lawyer helping my partner obtain an EEA EFM visa. She was ou...

Read More

Isaac .T

"Professional service. I was very impressed with the fact that my ILR applicatio...

Read More
Back to Top