One of the central tenets of the Vote Leave campaign in 2016 was the assertion that foreign workers from the EU took the jobs and prospects of the local domestic workforce. At the time, Brexiteer, Iain Duncan Smith, stated that "the government's own Migration Advisory Committee reported that for every 100 migrants employed 23 UK-born workers would have been displaced". In fact, according to the BBC who investigated this statistic, this number was actually for non-EU migrants. But, what was also missing was the point that foreign workers who remain in the UK for five or more years do not displace British-born workers. The BBC's Reality Check service also clarified that "no statistically significant effects were found for EU migrants coming to the UK". This is an important point which for many who voted Brexit, was lost in the melee of overlapping and often contradictory messaging during the referendum campaign.
In large part, this belief held because it was repeated so often by anti-EU politicians in the UK and by news media who were sympathetic to the leave cause. One article in the Sun newspaper back in February 2017 has the headline, "Brits are suffering from immigrants taking their jobs for half the price - we need an immigration deal that works for everyone, not just bosses who want cut-price labour. The current situation is unsustainable, so it's wonderful that we've left the single market".
The left-leaning media, including the Guardian and the Independent, did its best to point out the absolute inaccuracy of this narrative. One such article in the Guardian explains that the belief has its origins in an argument made by former Home Secretary and Prime Minister Teresa May, that lower-skilled workers coming to the UK depresses the wages of domestic workers. This was heavily debunked by research by the London School of Economics in May 2016 which concluded that "migration from other EU countries has not had an adverse impact on the wages and job prospects of UK-born workers". The research also found that areas of Britain with the largest increase in workers from the EU have not "suffered sharp falls in pay or seen a bigger reduction in job opportunities than other parts of the country". They make the key point that the actual reason for falling wages was not immigration but rather the ongoing impact of the 2008 recession.
Jonathan Wadsworth, one of the co-authors of the report, stated that "for the most part it [migration of workers from the EU] has likely made us better off". The report also states, "EU immigrants pay more in taxes than they use public services, and therefore they help to reduce the budget deficit. Immigrants do not have a negative effect on local services such as education, health or social housing; nor do they have any effect on social instability as indicated by crime rates".
It is likely, therefore, that the reason people believed EU immigrants took the jobs of the local workforce was the combined effect of a) the very real reduction in wages following 2008 financial crash and the resultant period of austerity and b) the repetition of this belief by the media and politicians in the run-up to the Brexit referendum in 2016. As such, it could be argued that the reduction in wages due to the 2008 recession provided the perfect set of adverse circumstances on which to blame EU workers, and hence drive home the point that the UK should leave the EU.
There is a sound reason why most of the dialogue regarding whether immigrants suppress wages and job opportunities has been centred on EU workers. Firstly, the campaigning and media messaging around Brexit has been and continues to be about the benefits of leaving the EU and of stopping free movement; secondly, non-EU migrants are already heavily restricted from working in the UK and must have sufficient skill levels to do so. Because of this, those with high skills were possibly seen as adding to the economy more than those with lower skills.
According to an analysis by IZA World of Labour, an organisation which uses evidence-based research to advise on policymaking, the "short-term wage effects of immigrants are close to zero€”and in the long term immigrants can boost productivity and wages". While this is a US-based research organisation, their conclusions are borne out by other researchers and institutions in the UK and the EU. Indeed their paper states that "many people hold the belief that immigrants "take jobs" from the native labour force in industrial countries; that they crowd out job opportunities; and that they depress wages". In other words, this narrative is the same worldwide, and in no way unique to the UK. What they say is that this belief is based on the overly "simplified, static model of labour demand and supply in which immigration increases the supply of some workers while everything else in the economy remains fixed". They say the only way to truly understand the impact of migrant workers on the economy, and hence the local workforce is to consider how local economies "respond to immigrant inflows by expanding, investing, adjusting product specialisation, adopting efficient technologies, and creating new businesses".
Using this logic, it can be seen that any minor impact on wages of domestic workers (which is close to zero) is completely cancelled and reversed out by the resulting innovation, investment, and other changes which occur as a result of a thriving economy which encourages skills and labour from outside of the country.
The message that migrant workers damage the work prospects of domestic workers has very much been debunked. Those who still maintain that the UK's immigration policy has harmed wages and jobs will need to wait until 2021 to see how leaving the EU really pans out for them in terms of job prospects. Already the Home Office has stated categorically that low skilled migrants will not be allowed into the UK, and hence such roles will ultimately need to be fulfilled by British nationals and settled workers. Whether this increases job prospects and wages across the economy will remain to be seen.
Find out the most in-demand jobs of the 2020s
It's a shame that you dont have an 'Excellent' star rating on here, as my experience with Reiss Edwards is nothing short of an excellent rating. They handled my application for an Indefinite Leave to remain in April 2014 and did my husband's one very recently including my daughter. Every time i have approached them, they have continued to treat me with courtesy, respect and patience. Amar was indeed a very thorough and professional gentleman. He is very knowledgeable, corporative and engaging. He responded to my emails, calls and enquiries promptly. He was always reassuring. I could not have asked for a better Immigration service. I would recommend them over and over again for anyone looking for an immigration advice. They gave me a free immigration advice when i called them, and the quality of the advice was something other charge thousands for. If you need a particular, name, Amar would be it. He exemplifies, for me, the true, professional gentleman. He is a valuable asset to Reiss Edwards.
I am glad that i instructed Reiss Edwards on my visa matter. It started with a 20 minutes free immigration advice. I met with Amar to discuss my ILR refusal. He gave me a great deal of quality advice and decided to take on my messy case. I had doubts on the merits of my case by he was relatively convinced he could win it. That made me quite secure. To be honest, things did not start as quick as I would have wanted, but they kept on communicating the process and state of things to me.A big thank you to Verusha and Foram. They were also very helpful. Brilliant and informative. Their fee was fair and reasonable, especially if you compare them to other law firms and immigration law firms in London; some of whom even told me that i would not be able to get an indefinte leave to remain in this country. The process was long but was worth it. In the end, a big thank you to Reiss Edwards.
Investing over 2 million pounds is defintely not a routine decision. We had to make sure that the Tier 1 investor immigration lawyers that we'd be picking has to be one of the best within the Tier 1 investor category. We contacted Reiss Edwards and they were able to get us not only the Tier 1 investor visa but also suggested profitable investment portfolios in addition to what we already had in mind.
TI have just had British Citizenship application approved. Prior to making the application, i was not sure which law firm i should hire to facilitate the paperwork. After a few hours of research, i decided to go with Reiss Edwards and i must confess that i wasnt disappointed. The immigration lawyers at Reiss Edwards handled my case well and they really knew what they were doing. They were fully aware of what documents I needed and it was easy for them to tell if my case was going to be easy or not. At the end of the day, I have not received my British citizenship within 3 months. If anyone is looking for a good immigration lawyer to handle thier case, contact Reiss Edwards.
My wife's spouse visa extension application was refused by the Home Office and they gave her 14 days to leave the country. We contacted Reiss Edwards and they said "OK don't worry we will sort this out". They put together the list of documents for me to obtain and they prepared a bundle which was as thick as the printer it came out from.We followed everything they asked us to do and in the end we won our appeal and got our spouse visa. We can't recommend them enough and we have promised ourselves never to make any more UK visa applications without them.
The team of lawyers at Reiss Edwards are very professional and friendly people. Their experience in and around UK immigration law is quite extensive; be sure that you application is in safe and competent hands. My immigration matter was an indefinite leave to remain application based on Tier 1 on a self-employment basis. The immigration lawyers at Reiss Edwards made sure that the application was perfect and ready to be accepted. I got a positive decision and I recommend them highly for anyone who needs a UK immigration help.
I contacted Reiss Edwards to help me with my wife's UK settlement visa. They acted with utmost professionalism throughout the entire application. I spoke with Joe Dinh, he is an immigration solicitor and he is one of the best solicitors out there. He ensured that there was little to no room for error. At some point I thought he was over cautious. He remained calmed and continued to assure us on our immigration matter. Most people in his position would have panicked but he was calmed and continued to assure us. We received out positive outcome very quickly.
I have been using Reiss Edwards for three years now for my family's immigration application. Both for my initial application and extension. They are really affordable. The team of solicitors at this firm are probably one of the most efficient and economical in terms of cost. They offered free advice over the phone and spent good time with us before inviting us for consultation.
Reiss Edwards is a top notch immigration service company. The way they handled our documentation and also the list of documents they sent was efficient and top quality. They helped us professionally throughout the process. We are very happy with the immigration advice we received from the team. We highly recommend them.
I used Reiss Edwards immigration lawyers to assist with my immigration matter and that of my family. It was an EX1 application. They dealt with the matter properly and even when complications were coming up from the Home Office, they helped resolve the issue properly. They are very professional and are very popular in London. I am happy to have worked with them.
This is the only firm that i spoke with that didn't ask for money before listening to me, will be using them again.
I used Reiss Edwards for my Tier 2 visa application and it was successful. The team was ever present and happy to answer my question. The caseworker that dealing with my case went on holiday yet by case did not suffer one bit. Another lawyer stepped and took over the case without any hassle.
My Tier 1 Investor Visa was dealt with quickly and without issue. Would recommend Reiss Edwards as an Immigration law firm in London. Thank you to the team.
530 ReviewsREAD ALL REVIEWS